Laserfiche WebLink
Marty stated that Sarah to address training some form of out if it does not work. They will <br /> spend dollars upfront for the interface and will not get that back. There needs to be feasibility to <br /> force compliance and the interface has to work smoothly. <br /> Richardson stated we do not want a company that is not preforming what is needed they need <br /> to look at it and make sure it works and if not be able to get out if it doesn't. <br /> Discussion was held on the amount quoted in the RFP proposal the total cost is $164,750.00 <br /> there installation costs and document conversion costs and some travel costs. <br /> Bredthauer ask where the company is located and Karpel is in St. Louis Missouri. <br /> Marty stated he check the references and the city of Lincoln and Otoe County still have Spillman <br /> interface and there are 2 in the state of Washington that have the Spillman interface. He feels <br /> confident as he can based on the information that he has. <br /> Hurst made a motion and Quandt seconded to give Mr. Klein the approval to purchase the <br /> Karpel Prosecutor software. <br /> Lancaster ask if any county in the state uses this and Mr. Klein stated that Sarpy County uses <br /> the CMA but they have their own system and there was a concern that the E Citations would not <br /> work with CMS software. Lancaster noted that the software is expensive but there are not a lot <br /> of options we do not want to have issues like the assessor's office. <br /> Mr. Klein stated that he has $64,000. It was discussed that the rest would have to come out of <br /> the inheritance fund. <br /> Lancaster expressed concern that the software is expensive and so was the assessor's <br /> software but there are not a lot of options. Mr. Klein stated he will address the possibility of cost <br /> sharing with other agencies and there could be interlocal agreements. He noted the training <br /> and that they did increase the number of users from 25 to 30 and that was consistent with the <br /> cost proposal. He will make sure that this will work and should be able to give back the <br /> employee. <br /> The vote on the motion to purchase the software was taken. . Bredthauer, Hartman, Hurst, <br /> Lancaster, Quandt, Peterson and Richardson all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> 5 D) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE <br /> NEBRASKA OFFICE OF SECRETARY OF STATE REGARDING ELECTION SECURITY <br /> SERVICES - Quandt made a motion and Bredthauer seconded to move forward with agreement <br /> with the Secretary of State regarding the election security services and authorize the chair to <br /> sign. Bredthauer, Hartman, Hurst, Lancaster, Quandt, Peterson and Richardson all voted yes <br /> and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> 13 an EXECUTIVE SESSION HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT - Mr. Hartman ask for an executive <br /> session and discussion was held that this does not qualify for an executive session. Hartman <br /> stated that he represents 95% of the rural area and he was approached that he is treating <br /> people wrong and if someone else should represent them. Discussion was held and there <br /> 8 <br />