Laserfiche WebLink
5e CONSIDER &APPROVE CONTRACT FOR ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING <br /> SERVICES RELATING TO INTERIOR REMODEL OF CHILD SUPPORT OFFICE AT <br /> FEDERAL BUILDING —Mr. Zitterkopf and Marvin Webb were present. Mr. Zitterkopf stated the <br /> board has a copy of the contract for the architectural and engineering services. Mr. Webb has <br /> gathered the old plans of the building and has the ability to work before being paid up front. He <br /> has estimates on the costs but does not want to reveal the costs because there will be a public <br /> time and place to approve these and he wants to preserve the integrity of the bidding process. <br /> Quandt made a motion and Lanfear seconded to approve the architectural and engineering <br /> contract. <br /> Stacey stated that there was discussion at the last meeting to take out the restrooms that were <br /> on the preliminary drawing. The modifications can be made and if the staff restrooms are not <br /> necessary they can build walls and call it storage. There was a request for a maintenance <br /> storage room. They noted the changes. <br /> Mr. Zitterkopf stated there was one additional item in the contract it basically limits Mr. Webb's <br /> liability to the dollar amount of the contract. In recent years the liability for architects has <br /> skyrocketed and if they were building a building that involved the structural integrity it may be <br /> necessary but this just involves walls and fixtures so there is minimal exposure. <br /> Lancaster questioned if they were deleting the restrooms from the design and Jack explained <br /> that the exhibit area is left open for future use. The space and the plumbing will be available for <br /> future use and it is reasonable to make the changes now. <br /> The vote on the motion was taken. Arnold, Lancaster, Lanfear, Purdy, Quandt and Richardson <br /> all voted yes and none voted no. Schuppan was absent. Motion carried. <br /> Mr. Webb explained that since they were able to find the CAD files it was a great help because <br /> it eliminated the field measuring. <br /> COUNTY ATTORNEY B) EXECUTIVE SESSION --PENDING LITIGATION. <br /> D) EXECUTIVE SESSION — POTENTIAL LITIGATION—Mr. Zitterkopf requested an executive <br /> session for the pending litigation and the potential litigation. He requested that the Corrections <br /> Director be included <br /> Lancaster made a motion and Purdy seconded to go into executive session for the potential <br /> litigation and pending litigation. These executive sessions are to protect the public interest and <br /> to prevent needles harm or injury to an individual. Arnold, Lancaster, Lanfear, Purdy, Quandt <br /> and Richardson all voted yes and none voted no. Schuppan was absent. Motion carried. <br /> 9:45 a.m. to 10:05. A.m. executive session for pending litigation <br /> 10:05 a.m. to 10:43 a.m. executive session for potential litigation <br /> 10:43 a.m. Quandt made a motion and Lancaster seconded to go out of executive session <br /> No other subjects were discussed, no votes were taken and no action was taken. Arnold, <br /> Lancaster, Lanfear, Purdy, Quandt and Richardson all voted yes and none voted no. Schuppan <br /> was absent. Motion carried. <br /> 4 <br />