Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Zitterkopf stated that he was not aware of what was going on but the additional conditions <br /> should be in writing as an addendum to the contract. <br /> Mr. Humphrey stated that he is also to reimburse the county for damages to 4 sprinkler heads at <br /> $135.00 a piece. They estimate that there are about 8 tons of materials to be removed and he <br /> is to pay $100.00 a ton for the remainder that is to be removed in addition to the $50.00 that he <br /> has already paid. <br /> The fire sprinkler heads measure the heat and if they are using a torch the sparks could hit a <br /> head and cause it to burst and spray water. He is to also cover all cost of any other sprinkler <br /> heads that may be damaged. <br /> Mr. Arnold questioned what Mr. Humphrey had to do to monitor them. He stated that they did <br /> not have access to all of the floors and some of them are not secured. He would just check to <br /> monitor the progress and stated it is about 75% done. If it is not completed we will have to hire <br /> someone to compete the job. He also noted that they broke out some windows for ventilation. <br /> He brought this issue to the committee to address. There is no liability by allowing another 30 <br /> days and the county may be able to recover some of the damages. <br /> Mr. Quandt noted that if they do not finish the project the county would have to hire someone to <br /> finish the job. Mr. Ziola asked if they were insured and the insurance is as requested by the <br /> county. <br /> The vote on the motion was taken. Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, Quandt and Ziola all voted <br /> yes and Purdy and Schuppan voted no. Motion carried. <br /> NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS— Mr. Zitterkopf asked if the request to review the industrial <br /> tract from the city was addressed. County Clerk Marla Conley stated that they have received <br /> the information are in the process of completing. <br /> Meeting recessed until 1:00 p.m. <br /> 15.1:00 P.M. VIEW THE ARCHITECTURAL PRESENTATION BY CANNON, MOSS, <br /> BRYGGER/DEWBERRY REGARDING THE COURTHOUSE PROJECT TO BE FOLLOWED <br /> BY A TELECONFERENCE QUESTION AND ANSWER PERIOD WITH DEWBERRY AND CMB <br /> REPRESENTED BY BRAD KISSLER <br /> Returned to session at 1:00 m for the presentation present was Brad Kissler with Cannon <br /> Brygger and Moss and there will be a teleconference with Dewberry. There are 6 alternate <br /> proposals. The board and people viewed the presentation regarding the various options. <br /> Held a 10 minute break to set up the teleconference with Dewberry. Michael and Chris <br /> reviewed the options and the ratings of option A3, B3, and B1 options. They had also provided <br /> a spread sheet with some cost estimates of the options. <br /> Discussion was held on using the courthouse annex and there is concern on the columns. <br /> These cannot be eliminated because of the initial construction. The judges expressed concern <br /> on the columns also. <br /> Mr. Schuppan questioned the $275.00 or$300.00 a square foot was low. Michael stated he <br /> 6 <br />