Laserfiche WebLink
was comfortable with that cost. <br /> The board asked Mark with Dewberry which option would be the least disruptive to the function <br /> of the courthouse A3 would be more B3 would be the worst and B1 is a direct attachment and <br /> all would entail some disruption. The board will need to address two options. <br /> Mr. Ruiz expressed concern on the number of staff that will be needed for 2 separate buildings <br /> and this would also be an issue for the Sheriff. He also expressed concern on the holding cells. <br /> Discussion was held on the video conferencing that may be available in the future and the size <br /> of the court rooms. <br /> Mr. McFarland stated the biggest costs are the exterior walls. Discussion was held on option B <br /> 2 and 83. <br /> Lancaster noted that parking is an issue the security and corrections department staffing are <br /> also issues. There are also issues regarding the judicial, public and inmate populations that <br /> need to be addressed. With the historic building they need to decide what options are truly <br /> feasibly and the most functional for the long haul. It is not advisable to look at moving the <br /> campus or looking at another building to move the courts. It helps to have a company that is <br /> familiar with courthouse projects. <br /> The board thanked Dewberry for the teleconference. <br /> NEW OR UNFINISHED BUSINESS— Chairman McFarland called for new or unfinished <br /> business and no one responded. <br /> Meeting adjourned at 3:20 a.m. I,�, <br /> L7r/ dt6C (4.6 <br /> O AL1 C' <br /> :le 2,; rt.,4 <br /> Marla J. onley Hall County GI , , <br /> 4 -thBAS�l� <br /> 7 <br />