Laserfiche WebLink
the offer of the $600,000.00 from the county and he will make a recommendation to the city <br /> council. He thinks this will be the highest and best use of the building for the community. <br /> Mr. McFarland stated that if the county does not go forward with this offer there was talk that the <br /> city utilities department may want the building. They have discussed the cost of leaving people <br /> in the building during the renovation process. There is a meeting on Friday with the staff and <br /> judges to go over the process. It is worth our money to purchase the building and move over <br /> there. <br /> Mr. Zitterkopf recommended allowing 60 days for the City to remove their belongings. <br /> Arnold pointed out that the county will be meeting with the judges and staff on Friday January <br /> 17th. <br /> The voted on the motion to approve the purchase of the building was taken. Lancaster, <br /> McFarland, Quandt and Ziola all voted yes and Arnold, Purdy and Schuppan voted no. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> 12. DISSOLUTION REGARDING SOUTH CENTRAL RCD - Mr. Quandt stated that he serves <br /> on the South Central Economic Development Board the RCD has not had a meeting in 2 years. <br /> There was discussion a year ago to dissolve the corporation. There are some assets that are <br /> held by the corporation and there are other counties involved. He wanted to let the board know <br /> what is happening and let Mr. Erickson know about his concerns. Ms. Lancaster stated that we <br /> should let them know that Hall County has concerns and that the assets should be returned to <br /> the members. Discussion was held and Mr. Zitterkopf stated that it would be prudent to send a <br /> letter to them stating it is our understanding that they are talking about dissolving the <br /> corporation and our concerns regarding the assets. <br /> Lancaster made a motion and Quandt seconded to send a letter to the RCD. Arnold, <br /> Lancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 15. EXECUTIVE SESSION PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Lancaster made a motion and <br /> Ziola seconded to go into executive session. This executive session is to prevent needless <br /> harm to injury to an individual. Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and <br /> Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> 11:30 a.m. executive session <br /> 11:36 a.m. Lancaster made a motion and Ziola seconded to go out of executive session. No <br /> other subjects were discussed. <br /> Lancaster made a motion and Quandt seconded to present the evaluation to the personnel <br /> committee and to the employee at 8:30 a.m. before the next meeting. Arnold, Lancaster, <br /> McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. Motion <br /> carried. <br /> COMMITTEE OR BOARD MEMBER REPORTS — Lancaster reported that Dewberry the <br /> consultants were here to analyze the option for the Courthouse. They arrived Tuesday viewed <br /> the building worked Wednesday and came back on Thursday with 6 options. Judge Wright had <br /> encouraged the committee to use a consultant that deals with courts. She also noted that there <br /> 7 <br />