Laserfiche WebLink
the assessar he questioned why Hall County was at this point. Mr. Ziala stated that many <br /> counties are going in this directions and it could be a passible cost savings. <br /> Mr. Clark also not�d that the two offices do not have any cammon duties and do not share staff <br /> members and questioned why these 2 departments should be combined. <br /> Arnold stated that the 2 department do not have the sam� duties but much of the information is <br /> the same and it may be more efficient to merge the 2 departments. Mr. Clark noted that <br /> Lancaster County has combined the 2 department and qu�stioned if the board has talked to <br /> them. <br /> Mr. Quandt noted that this was discussed 2 years ago they are trying to save money. <br /> Schuppan stated that this would be discussion that could occur at the public hearing. He also <br /> noted that a survey was dane and it contained information. Mr. Clark noted that Hall County is <br /> larger that most counties around us and we would have different needs. He also questioned if <br /> there were any cost savings to Lancaster Caunty. <br /> Arnold stated that the board certainly wants to invite the public to participate and welcomes any <br /> informatian that can be provided. Mr. Clark questioned if the board will consider the public <br /> input. <br /> Schuppan made a motion and Quandt seconded ta proceed with the time line for the <br /> combination of the Register of Deeds and Assessor and set the public hearing far June 19, <br /> 2012 and set the weed board public hearing for July 3, 2012. Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, <br /> Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. Arnold was absent. <br /> Motion carried <br /> Held a Board of Corrections meeting <br /> Returned to the regular meeting. <br /> 10. CORRECTION STEERING COMMITT�E RECOMMENDATION -AWARD BID FOR <br /> INMATE MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES —Carrections Director Fred Ruiz was present. In the <br /> bid for the inmate mental health services the hourly and monthly rate was not calculated <br /> carrectly the hourly and monthly did not match. He discussed this with Jerry Janulewicz and he <br /> suggested accepting the monthly rate. <br /> Arnold made a motion and Quandt seconded to accept the monthly rate of$5,665.60. Arnold, <br /> Lancast�r, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> 12. COMPUTER COMMITT�E RECOMMENDATION - DISCUSSION REGARDING HEARING <br /> ASSISTANCE SYSTEM FQR TH� COUNTY BOARD ROOM - IT Director poug Drudik was <br /> present. This was discussed in the computer committee meeting and Mr. Drudik stated that <br /> they would need a transmitter and 2 receivers or 2 headsets ADA regulations recommends if <br /> there are 50 or less you would need 2 headsets. This cauld be paid out of miscellaneous <br /> general. The proposed system is smaller at a cost of$832.50 and is very affordable. <br /> Mr. McFarland explained the looping system it is a permanent system so any one with a hearing <br /> aid would be able to hear and it would use the current microphone system. <br /> 4 <br />