May 22, 2012 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Lancaster thanked him for coming. PUBLIC PARTICIPATION — Chairman Lancaster called far public participation and no one responded. 4. COUNTY ATT�RNEY-- HALL COUNTY JUVENILE DIVER510N 3 YEAR PLAN — Deputy County Attorney Jack Zitterkopf stated #hat there needs to be some action to get this signed. Mr. Young could not be here and he did not brief Jack about this plan. The new Juvenile Diversion Director is Kelli Schadwinkel, this is Kelli's second day and Robyn Hassel could not be here today. Clay Schutz Chief probation officer stated that the Crime Cammission is the vehicle at the state I that allots the grant money and by state statute every county is to have on file a 3-year � comprehensive juvenile service plan. This plan needs to be signed and sent to the crime commission by June 6. The plan was due January 15t but they were able to get an extension. He expressed concern that Hall County has missed out on a lot of funding so it is impartant to have this on file. Lancaster quested what funding that was not rec�ived and Mr. Schutz stated that the tracker services was nat funded and we need to apply for the grants. He stated that the key change is the process they used and how the community has come together with a collaborative effort from Hall County to represent the true needs. Jon Kuzman with Kuzman Consulting stated that the community team braught all of the groups together and made it a county wide plan, they had 25 to 30 people per meeting and incorporated all of the other groups in the current plan. This plan has included the entire community. Quandt made motion and Arnold seconded to adopt the 3 year plan and authorize the Chair to sign. Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. Arnold was absent. Motion carried 9. DISCUSS AND APPROVE TIMELINE FOR ELIMINATION OF WE�D BOARD & COMBINING REGISTER O� DEEDS & ASSESSORS OFFICES —Jack Zitterkopf prepared a time line for the public hearing for the register of deeds and the public hearing far the weed board. The weed board does not require a public hearing by state statute but the board has proposed to hald one. They have until September 4th to get it on the ballot for the November election. The elimination af the weed board could be a resolution from the county board to take over the functions. Schuppan questioned how this wauld affect the terms of the current wee baard members and Mr. Zitterkapf stated that the statutes regarding this are not as detailed so they could wait until the first of the year to take over the functions. Lancaster stated that it would be more orderly to wait until the first of the year. Quandt stated he attended the weed board meeting and there are 3 members up for election and he would encourage them to run in the event that the public wants to keep the weed baard intact. Mitchell Clark Register of Deeds state that after reading the paper about merging the deeds and 3