Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />��� <br />— <br />- <br />0 - <br />� ��. <br />� ��� <br />W o� <br />� �� <br />� _�_ <br />� <br />�� <br />— <br />��� <br />��� <br />�� <br />� <br />� <br />s <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />--� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />6 <br />e� <br />� <br />� <br />l'/ <br />g .,.: <br />ya: <br />i <br />,�'', <br />i <br />i� <br />2�1�03�.�4 <br />�� <br />� c <br />, c � ; , <br />� q ...., : _ ' <br />C} P. <br />� �_ <br />r �. <br />� ., i <br />o �.: <br />m w <br />m ,c� <br />� S <br />f07 <br />G1 <br />1 -.—� <br />� <br />-o <br />� <br />N <br />-�] <br />� <br />� <br />f� <br />G.7 <br />N <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� <br />� �° <br />, V � <br />o � <br />N � <br />F-� <br />O � <br />L..� � <br />�a <br />� <br />� <br />�N THE DISTRiCT COURT OF T�ALL COUN1'Y, NEBRASKA <br />� � <br />� '�"{ <br />C D <br />z —' <br />--+ � <br />� O <br />� � <br />� � <br />� n� <br />D m <br />r � <br />r y- <br />C,� : <br />r�+ <br />n <br />�1 v <br />4� <br />,tJ) <br />�� �� <br />� <br />BRI�iN E. URBOM, <br />Plaintiff, <br />vs. <br />5HELLEY R. URBOM, <br />Defendant. <br />Case No. CI 09-1182 <br />DEGItEE <br />��� <br />AUG 0 2 2QiQ <br />�VAL�pI� BENDI��N <br />Ct.ERK OFDtSi''�RfCT COl1RT <br />ON May 18, 2010, this matter came on for trial upon the Complaint for <br />Dissolution of 1Vlarriage. The Plaintiff was present with Attorney Arthur S. <br />Wetzel. The Defendant was present with Attorney James A. Wagoner. Evidence <br />was adduced, arguments presented, and the rnatter was taksn under advisement. <br />NOW UN TflIS 2nd day of August, 2Q1Q, this matter cornes on for <br />decision. After consideration af the evidence, arguments of counsel, and the <br />applicable 1aw, TI� 'COURT r'INDS A5 FOLLOWS: <br />1. Jurisdiction Flaintiff and Defendant have been residents of the State <br />of Nebraska for more than one year prior to tha filing and residents of Hall County <br />at the time of the filing herein. The Defendant has entered her appearance in this <br />action. The Court has jurisdiction over both parties and of the subject rnatter of <br />this action, The Plaintiff is not a party to any other pending ac�ions fax divarce, <br />separation, or dissolution of marriage. <br />� <br />Page / of� <br />���� <br />� � 2 3 e�t <br />Y <br />000194949D08 <br />