My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
201001588
LFImages
>
Deeds
>
Deeds By Year
>
2010
>
201001588
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/11/2010 3:12:41 PM
Creation date
3/11/2010 3:11:18 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DEEDS
Inst Number
201001588
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />., :., <br />.. -:Ir <br />,~i <br />2oiooi5ss <br />IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HALL COUNTY, NEBRASKA <br />KAY MARIE DAMS <br />VS. <br />_ DAVID CHRIST DAMS <br />FILEID <br />DEB 7 2001 <br />MERMAN <br />"sE OF DISSOLUTION <br />Case No. CI 00-841 <br />On December 8, 2000 this matter came on for final hearing. <br />~`~J <br />V <br />izp2~7~ <br />Petitioner was present in court with counsel, Richard E. Gee. Respandent was neither <br />present nor represented by an attorney. <br />The petition for dissolution of marriage was filed on October 5, 2000. <br />Respondent's voluntary appearance was entered herein an October 5, 2000. <br />Pursuant to Neb. Rev. Stat. §42-363 (Reissue 1993), more than sixty days have elapsed <br />since service of said petition upon the Respondent. <br />Respondent has not filed a responsive pleading but he did receive notice of this hearing. <br />Testimony and evidence were presented. The hearing was cantinued. <br />On. January 23, 2001, the hearing continued. <br />Petitioner was present in court with caunsel, Richard E. Gee. Respandent was neither <br />present nor represented by an attorney. <br />Further testimony and evidence were presented. <br />The court, being fully advised in the premises, FINDS, ORDERS, ADJUDGES AND <br />DECREES as follows: <br />1. The court has jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action and to <br />make a child custody determination. <br />2. Reasonable efforts have been made to reconcile the marriage, but notwithstanding, the <br />marriage is irretrievably broken. The marriage of Kay Marie Davis and David Christ Davis is <br />hereby dissolved. <br />3. For the purpose of review by appeal, this decree shall be treated as a final order on the <br />date the decree is signed. If an appeal is instituted within 30 days after the decree is signed, such <br />~~ ~ <br />Pa e I of ~ ` <br />g ~~. <br />~. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.