My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
88102198
LFImages
>
Deeds
>
Deeds By Year
>
1988
>
88102198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/9/2007 5:41:16 PM
Creation date
3/9/2007 4:33:59 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DEEDS
Inst Number
88102198
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />, <br />t <br /> <br />.i <br /> <br />88-102198 <br /> <br />-4- <br /> <br />after payment of real estate taxes and mortgage shall.be dis- <br />tributed' one-fourt.h (1/4) to Wilma Belangie, one-folu:;th (1/4) to <br />Mary Thompson, one-fourth (1/4) to Robert Mettenbrink, one-eighth <br />U/8) to Kelly Ann Emery, and one-eighth (1/8) to Joseph C. Eme!:y. <br />In the event it is determined that the Internal Revenue <br /> <br />Service, which is a party to the Partition action, Case No. 88- <br />122, has a valid lien against the interest of Robert Mettenbrink <br />and May Mettenbrink in any real estate referred to herein, said <br />Claimants agree to satisfy or make other suitable provisions <br />for the release of the lien, and all parties agree to cure any <br />defects of title in a reasonable manner as soon as commercially <br />reasonable. <br /> <br />The Court, having heard the stipulation of the parties, <br />finds that the stipulation should be approved. The Court also <br />finds upon further stipulation of the parties that the costs <br />in the partition lawsuit should be borne by the Personal Repre- <br />sentative and paid as an expense of administration. <br /> <br />IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED BY THE COURT that the foregoing <br /> <br />stipulation is approved and that the claims case, 86-310, ,is <br />dismissed. <br /> <br />AMENDMENT <br /> <br />On November 5, 1986, this cause came on for further dis- <br />position on the agreement and stipulation of the parties. The <br />Claimants, Robert Mettenbrink and May Mettenbrink, were present <br />in Court and represented by Galen E. Stehlik. The Personal <br /> <br />Representative was represented by Duane A. Burns. The Intervenors <br /> <br />were represented by Bruce L Smith. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.