Laserfiche WebLink
<br />200607824 <br /> <br />assigned their ,-espective pension, retil~ement or annuity plan <br /> <br />presently held by them with their employers. As indicated in the <br /> <br />findings hereof, the Court finds that in comparison the wife's <br /> <br />pension plan, with her employer, is of little significance when <br /> <br />compared to the extent of the Respondent's accumulations in such <br /> <br />accounts. <br /> <br />During the trial the Respondent expressed his desire to <br /> <br />continue setting aside amounts in said accounts for his futur-e <br /> <br />retirement. Much of the contribution is voluntary and not forced <br /> <br />by his employer. <br /> <br />At the same time the record reflects that the <br /> <br />residence of the parties is the only other significant asset <br /> <br />besides the personal holdings, personal pr-operty, furnitur-e, <br /> <br />various pieces of equipment and vehicles. The Court finds that the <br /> <br />son, Ron, who is not involved as far as child support is concerned <br /> <br />has expressed a desire to continue his education, that he has <br /> <br />attempted to get loans for that purpose, which the testimony shows <br /> <br />were not supported by the Respondent. <br /> <br />The court under these ci rcumstances and with the evidence <br /> <br />before it finds that the property of the parties should be divided <br /> <br />as follows and so orders: <br /> <br />(1) <br /> <br />That all <br /> <br />accumulations in the Respondent's <br /> <br />retirement accounts, deferred income accounts and stock purchase <br /> <br />plans held with his employer should be assigned to the Respondent. <br /> <br />(2) That the Respondent shou 1 d rece i ve the fo 11 ow i ng <br /> <br />vehicles: <br /> <br />1977 Chevrolet <br />1974 Scout <br /> <br />~ <br />