My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
202405035
LFImages
>
Deeds
>
Deeds By Year
>
2024
>
202405035
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/10/2024 1:04:15 PM
Creation date
10/10/2024 1:04:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DEEDS
Inst Number
202405035
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
202405035 <br />professional life. The Plaintiff has begun full-time employment. The evidence indicates that <br />during the 19 years of the marriage the Plaintiff did suffer significant interruption in her <br />professional advancement by remaining in the home. <br />The Court is required, however, to also consider the overall financial circumstances of <br />the parties. In consideration of the earning capacity of the parties, their current financial <br />situations and the length of the marriage, the Court finds that the Plaintiff should receive alimony <br />in the amount of $500 per month for a period of 24 months beginning August 1, 2018. Alimony <br />is to terminate on the death or remarriage of the Plaintiff. <br />VI. PROPERTY DIVISION <br />The parties were unable to agree as to the valuation or division of the marital estate. In <br />making decisions regarding the estate the Court is mindful of the rule that: <br />The ultimate test for determining the appropriateness of the division of property is <br />reasonableness as determined by the facts of each case. The division of property <br />is not subject to a precise mathematical formula, but the general rule is to award a <br />spouse one-third to one-half of the marital estate. In dividing property and <br />considering alimony upon a dissolution of marriage, the court should consider <br />four factors (1) the circumstances of the parties, (2) the duration of the marriage, <br />(3) the history of contributions to the marriage, and (4) the ability of the supported <br />party to engage in gainful employment without interfering with the interests of <br />any minor children in the custody of each party, the polestar being fairness and <br />reasonableness as determined by the facts of each case. Meints v. Meints, 258 <br />Neb. 1017, 608 N.W.2d 564 (2004) (citations omitted). <br />(A) VALUATION OF MARITAL HOME AND PERSONAL PROPERTY <br />After consideration of the evidence, the Court finds that the appraisal provided by Mr. <br />Hinman is the most accurate valuation of the property. The Court finds the home located at 115 <br />West 23`1 Street, Grand Island, Hall County, Nebraska, is valued at $150,000. <br />7lPage <br />Page 7 of / <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.