My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-13-2001Minutes
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2001
>
11-13-2001Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2005 12:32:40 PM
Creation date
1/20/2005 12:32:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
County Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />('01663 <br /> <br />2d EXECUTIVE SESSION FOR DISCUSSION OF LITIGATION STRATEGY COUNTY <br />OF HALL v. BROSTROM AND HALL v. LANCASTER- Jeffries made a motion and <br />Humiston seconded to go into executive session. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, <br />Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />9:45 a.m. executive session on Hall vs Lancaster <br />10:00 a.m. completed executive session on Hall vs. Lancaster <br />10:01 a.m. executive session Hall vs. Brostrom <br />10:07 a.m. completed executive session on Hall vs Brostrom <br />Logan made a motion and Jeffries seconded to go out of executive session. Arnold, <br />Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted <br />no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />17. JUDGE LUTHER INTRODUCTION OF DRUG COURT COORDINATOR CONNIE <br />HUL TINE AND UPDATE ON DRUG COURT - Sheriff Jerry Watson stated that Judge <br />Luther was not able to come over at this time and he introduced Connie Hultine the new <br />coordinator for the drug court. He stated that she has been on the job for six weeks and <br />it is going well. She now has an office in all four counties in the courthouse. In Hall <br />County she is located in the Sheriffs office. Ms. Hultine stated that they are ahead of <br />schedule at this time. She is working on the policy and procedures manual and the <br />participant handbook. She has also met with each county. Once this work is completed <br />she will be requesting a federal grant of $500,000.00. This grant will require a 25% in- <br />kind match from the counties. The board thanked her for coming. <br /> <br />16. SHERIFF WATSON EQUIPMENT ACQUISITION REQUESTS TO PURCHASE <br />VEHICLES AND BALLISTIC VESTS AND INHERITANCE FUND REQUEST FOR <br />SECURITY EQUIPMENT AT COURTHOUSE. Sheriff Watson stated that $100,000.00. <br />Was budgeted for the purchase of the vehicles and he is now requesting the boards <br />approval. He is requesting to purchase 4 new Crown Victoria cars and he will trade in 3 <br />used vehicles. He is also requesting to purchase two unmarked units for a total of <br />$99,900.00. He will purchase the units through Anderson Ford, Grand Island at the <br />state bid price. The board questioned why he was only trading in three used vehicles <br />and Watson stated that he has added three more deputies from the COPS grant and this <br />only covers salaries, so he will need one more vehicle. <br /> <br />He is also requesting to purchase the ballistic vest for the deputies. Under the FOP <br />contract he is required to provide the vests and if the vests are purchased the deputies <br />are required to wear them. He will be spending $7,000.00 that was budgeted. Eriksen <br />questioned if it was an option for the sheriff deputies to wear the ballistic vests and if it <br />should be mandatory to wear them. Watson stated that if the vests are purchased the <br />deputies must wear them and they are available to every deputy. Eriksen expressed his <br />concern on the liability if a deputy is injured or killed and he is not wearing the vest. <br /> <br />The last request is to purchase a new scanner for the courthouse. The present scanner <br />is 10 years old and it is beyond the lifetime expectancy of the unit. They would like to <br />purchase a comparable unit. The scanner will cost $4,429.00 and also are requesting to <br />purchase two hand held wants at $150.00 each. The new unit will be able to locate <br />metal and where it is located on the subject. They will keep the old unit for a backup. <br />Eriksen made a motion and Lancaster seconded it to approve the requests for the <br />vehicle purchase and the ballistic vests from the equipment acquisition fund and to <br />approve the request to purchase the scanner from the inheritance fund. Arnold, Eriksen, <br /> <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.