My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-25-2001Minutes
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2001
>
09-25-2001Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/20/2005 12:25:34 PM
Creation date
1/20/2005 12:25:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
County Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />(01547 <br /> <br />Hartman, Humiston, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no with Jeffries <br />absent. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Chairman Hartman called for a break at 10:00 a.m. <br /> <br />10:15 a.m. returned to session <br /> <br />10:15 A.M. PUBLIC HEARING ON TOWERS AND SUPPLEMENTARY REGULATIONS: <br />Logan made a motion and Humiston seconded to open the public hearing. Arnold, <br />Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no with <br />Jeffries absent. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Regional Planning Director Chad Nabity was present and stated that the regional <br />planning board held a public hearing and approved the regulations that will require a <br />conditional use permit for towers in specific zoning districts for towers less than 100 ft in <br />height. He provided the board members with information on the required set backs in <br />the various zoning districts. The changes to the supplementary regulations require that <br />a building permit for a new dwelling will not be issued unless the frontage road has been <br />brought to standard if it is minimum maintenance. This would allow the county time to <br />plan and budget for the road improvements. The city requires that the road be <br />improved before a permit is issued. It is not fair for the county to pay for the <br />improvement of a road if only one person is building a home. Discussion was held and <br />Logan expressed concern that this would hurt the sale of the property and that a <br />minimum maintenance road would still allow access to the property. Hartman also <br />expressed concern that this was not right. Nabity stated that this would just provide time <br />to plan for the improvements. If the building permit was not issued it would allow time to <br />improve the road. Arnold stated that there are other ways for property owners to be <br />responsible for the road improvements like creating a street improvement district. <br /> <br />Discussion was held on the tower regulations and Nabity stated that concern was <br />expressed on the set back of the tower. It was suggested that the towers be set back <br />150% of the height but that may be excessive. He suggested that the towers are set <br />back 100% of the height of the tower plus the required set back in the zoning districts. <br />This would give the safety margin but it would not be excessive. <br /> <br />Logan made a motion and Lancaster seconded to close the public hearing. Arnold, <br />Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no with <br />Jeffries absent. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Logan made a motion and Lancaster seconded to recommend to the regional planning <br />commission to change regulation 8a to 100% of the height of the tower plus the required <br />set back in the zoning districts. The resolution will be changed to reflect this and <br />approved Resolution #010066 amending the Hall County Zoning Regulations to <br />Regulate Towers. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Lancaster and Logan all voted <br />yes and none voted no with Jeffries absent. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Logan made a motion and Lancaster seconded to refer the supplementary regulations <br />back to the regional planning commission for change. Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, <br />Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and Arnold voted no with Jeffries absent for the vote. <br />Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.