04/21/2026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

9F- FACILITIES UPDATE- Loren Humphrey stated they are spraying weeds and mowing, getting flowers planted at the park. He stated they will be framing walls in next couple weeks at the courthouse inside the building, and they already have most walls framed in the basement. They are starting to install duct work in couple locations. Poured front entryway sidewalk out and the columns for the canopy. Starting in May they are going to start tearing up pine street and redo where the parking lot is going to be. They are also going to start working on some landscaping around the building as well. They will be running electricity and sewer in the next week, he stated a lot going on and it is exciting it is all coming together. 10 DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION ON CHANGE ORDER NUMBER 9, CCP NO 023 ANNEX PAVING, SIDEWALK AND SALLY PORT UPDATES. CCP NO 024 UPDATE TO FLAGPOLE AND LIGHTING. CCP NO 025 CHANGES TO SWING DOOR UPDATE-Peterson stated there are 3 changes the primary one was annex paving, sidewalk in sallyport the cost is about $85,000, basically they expanded the drive out of the sallyport and also repouring some of the parking lot in front of the annex building because it is tore up, so going to do at the same time. Loren Humphrey stated there is that sidewalk that goes across the driveway that has been really broke up it will be better in winter for people to walk on, there is a lot of traffic on there from the County Attorneys and it has been a trip hazard for a long time, since we are going to close with the concrete I thought would be a good time to fix the sidewalk. Loren stated that the flagpole they are primarily adding lighting to it. Loren stated it is a 40-foot flagpole with 3 flags. Quandt asked if there is room for 3 flagpoles as when you have 3 flags flying together, they beat each other and get worn out quickly and get torn. Richardson made a motion to accept change order 9 with CCP no 23, 24, and 25, Sorensen seconded the motion. Hurst, Lancaster, Peterson, Richardson and Sorensen all voted yes, and Bredthauer and Quandt voted no, 5 yes votes, 2 no votes. Motion Carried. 11 DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION ON CONTRACT CHANGE PROPOSAL TO REMOVE COURTROOM-JURY BOX, SEATING THAT THE SUPPLIER HAD ORGINALLY INCLUDED IN SCOPE- Peterson stated the other item to talk about there's a change in the original proposal of the people that are doing the furniture in the courthouse that is connected as part of the project The judges have determined from our meeting the other day that they would like the jury boxes to be loose chairs rather than chairs that are tied down or bolted down. Primarily two things. One is handicap accessibility. And the second thing is if they have a situation where they have maybe two or three Alternates, right? You could have room for alternates. You'd have extra chairs for them. And the other thing is I think the same thing is in the witness chair. That change is a credit to us of 57,546 and then we will buy those separately.