Laserfiche WebLink
10. FACILITIES - A) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION ON BENCHES FOR <br /> COUNTY COURTROOM #1 & #2 - Loren Humphrey was present and expressed <br /> concern on the benches in Courtroom #1. Courtroom #2 the benches are holding. He <br /> explained that they are bolted down on a 2 X 6 and the bolts extend into the floor under <br /> the boards. They have been moved several times and it is difficult to make sure that <br /> they are secure. The bolts are working loose. He did check and the cost would be <br /> $9,000.00 for the benches and installation from Radigan Schottler Mfg. He is asking the <br /> board what they want to do. This Judge Wetzel's courtroom. <br /> Quandt sated there should be a way to fix the floor to secure the benches. He will look <br /> at them. Loren said the price will not change. This will come back in 2 weeks. <br /> B) DISCUSSION AND POSSIBLE ACTION TO REPAIR PARKING LOT ENTRANCE <br /> TO COUNTY ATTORNEY EAST PARKING LOT - Loren said the entrance to the <br /> parking lot needs repaired and they need to address an ADA issue. He has quotes <br /> from Galvan Construction for $4,800 and Diamond Engineering for $4,700. <br /> Quandt stated that Diamond has a job out here by the ADA approach and it is not <br /> correct. Loren said they should have put a curb on the one side. He has a price from <br /> Diamond to redo the entire curb. The section from the ramp should have had a curb. <br /> Loren said the quote he has is to replace the entire curb. Loren said it does meet ADA <br /> but for safety sake it should have been curbed it is sharp area. This estimate is for a <br /> whole new curb it is a trip hazard. <br /> Bredthauer made a motion and Richardson seconded the motion to go with the low bid <br /> from Diamond Engineering for the repairs to the County Attorney's east parking lot. <br /> Lancaster ask if Diamond did the job correctly and they did. There seems to be a <br /> problem with the original design. There is only $100.00 difference between the 2 <br /> proposals. <br /> The vote on the motion to go with low bid was taken. Bredthauer, Hurst, Lancaster, <br /> Richardson and Sorensen all voted yes and Quandt voted no. Peterson was absent. <br /> Motion carried. <br /> The issue with the Administration Building lot will be addressed in 2 weeks. <br /> d) DISCUSSION & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING CUSTODIAL COMPANY— Loren <br /> stated there was an issue with the new custodial company. They were to start July 1st <br /> to clean the restrooms and hallways but did not come. Loren said he called the <br /> everyday to come on site and to get their name badges. The director did come and one <br /> come on the tour. But on Friday the keys were on his desk He contacted the director <br /> and there was no staff and no cleaning equipment. Loren told them he was going to <br /> 4 <br />