My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/16/2017
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2017
>
05/16/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/23/2017 8:51:07 AM
Creation date
6/23/2017 8:50:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
He noted that last year there was a 20/% increase and the maximum cost for single was <br /> $601.03 and for family it was $1,456.63. There are no benefit changes or contract changes. <br /> They are recommending a 25% increase with Single at $751.29 and Family at $1,820.79 <br /> This represents the claim experience this year. There was a lot of discussion and he noted <br /> lines 16 and 17 where the county assumes risk on certain cases there were 4 participants with a <br /> total risk of$1,780,000. This year it has been reduced down to $450,000 there are actually 600 <br /> people covered by the plan. When the reinsurance contract went to the market out of 20 <br /> companies there were on 2 that responded. One was competitive but the lasers were high. So <br /> they are recommending the renewal with the 25% increase. <br /> Matt stated that there was discussion to raise the specific attachment to $75,000 and if they did <br /> that they might see $120,000 in premium savings. He noted the aggregating specific of <br /> $100,000. The county also assumes an additional $100,000 on 1 or more claims. They need to <br /> look at this year after year and if they see a specific trend move it up to the next level. Inflation <br /> also affects this aggregating specific. This can also be offset by a large claim. The specific <br /> attachment of$60,000 was also discussed by the committee. Normally you will have 7 or more <br /> cases that will hit the $60,000. This will be watched going forward. <br /> The 25% is a big increase but it is the best option for this year. Matt stated that we have bucked <br /> the trend for many years and the premiums are still less than the NACO plan. <br /> Stacey noted that at the budget meeting tomorrow they will discuss this more. <br /> Schuppan made a motion and Richardson seconded to move forward with the renewal with <br /> Berkley. Arnold, Bredthauer, Lancaster, Lanfear, Quandt, Richardson and Schuppan all voted <br /> yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> 20 HALL COUNTY TREASURER'S MISCELLANEOUS RECEIPTS <br /> 20a) APPROVE RESOLUTION TO INCREASE PUBLIC DEPOSITORY BOND TO <br /> $34,000,000.00 -Arnold made a motion and Lanfear seconded to place on file the Hall County <br /> Treasurer's miscellaneous receipts and to approve Resolution#17-025 To increase the public <br /> depository bond to $34,000,000.00. Arnold, Bredthauer, Lancaster, Lanfear, Quandt, <br /> Richardson and Schuppan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.