My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/21/2017
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2017
>
03/21/2017
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/20/2017 12:16:48 PM
Creation date
6/20/2017 12:16:45 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
65
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
OFFICE REPORT <br /> HALL COUNTY ASSESSOR/REGISTER OF DEEDS <br /> OFFICE REPORT <br /> FEBRUARY 2017 <br /> DOCUMENTARY STAMP FEES $ 5,141.49 <br /> RECORDING FEES $ 13,762.00 <br /> PHOTO COPIES $ 61.80 <br /> P& M FUND $ 2,244.50 <br /> TOTAL $ 21,209.79 <br /> OFFICE REPORT <br /> HALL COUNTY CLERK <br /> FEBRUARY 2017 <br /> MARRIAGE LICENSES $ 1,050.00 <br /> RECORDING FEES/PUBLICATION $ .00 <br /> PHOTO COPIES/FAXES $ 11.00 <br /> PLAT BOOKS/OTHER $ 30.00 <br /> CERTIFIED COPIES MARRIAGE LICENSES $ 540.00 <br /> POSTAGE FEES $ 0.00 <br /> PUBLICATION FEES & MISC. 0.00 <br /> TOTAL $ 1,631.00 <br /> 9:05 a.m. Held a Board of Equalization meeting <br /> 9:28 a.m. Adjourned the Board of Equalization meeting <br /> 7. DISCUSSION AND ACTION REGARDING BIDS FOR SCANNING PROJECT FOR HALL <br /> COUNTY ASSESSOR/REGISTER OF DEEDS —The bids for the scanning project were <br /> received March 7. County Assessor/Register of Deeds Jan Pelland stated that there were two <br /> bids received. Microfilm Imaging for$39,695.00 and Sutterfield Technologies for $23,214.30. <br /> Doug Drudik reviewed the bid for the technical aspect and both companies would comply with <br /> what is needed. They did contact Microfilm Imaging and informed them that they may delete <br /> one of the categories out of the initial bid and they stated the bid would stay the same. Pelland <br /> stated they currently work with Microfilm Imaging they are out of Omaha and she would <br /> recommend staying with them. The other company is from Duncan Oklahoma and she is not <br /> familiar with their work and they are out of state. She expressed concern that they would have <br /> overhead costs and expressed concern on the difference between the 2 bids. Discussion was <br /> held to postpone awarding the bids and take time to get back to both of the companies. There <br /> is $16,000.00 difference on the bids. <br /> Arnold stated that if we ask people to submit bids there needs to be a good reason not to go <br /> with the low bid. They can still negotiate what is to be removed. <br /> Lancaster noted there may be a reason there is such a difference between the two bids and we <br /> need to check the references and consider the amount of the bids. <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.