08/25/2015 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Quandt questioned why the board has not been informed about the change orders a copy was in the packet and Mr. Humphrey asked what he wants done. He will provide updates and keep communication open and he stated that no one expressed any concerns last week. Lanfear stated that he will keep everyone informed. 7. DISCUSS & POSSIBLE ACTION REGARDING DISSOLVING CORRECTIONS STEERING COMMITTEE - Quandt stated there is a board of corrections and they need to be the ones making the decisions issues were not brought forward and we owe the taxpayers and the employees stability. He would like to dissolve the steering committee for at least one year. Quandt made a motion and Lancaster seconded, for discussion, to dissolve the corrections steering committee for one year. Lancaster understands entire board needs to be informed it is a major issue she would consider the director giving a status report each time they meet Schuppan if problems come up between board meetings it would limit ability to help Arnold suggested biweekly board of corrections meetings. Pam withdrew her second and stated they could require a biweekly report and all reports come to the board the committee cannot take action. Arnold called for a 2nd no one seconded the motion. Motion failed. Lancaster made a motion and Lanfear seconded to schedule biweekly board of corrections meetings and have biweekly updates from the interim director. Quandt stated Scott has a conflict of interest and asked if he took verbage back to the police department. Arnold replied that nothing that was not public was disclosed and this is not appropriate at this time. Quandt stated we have to do away with this committee Arnold said he would step down. Schuppan stated that this is out of line and just a personal attack. Lanfear asked if we abolish the committee what will it improve they need a go to person for input this is just a cheap shot to Scott. Arnold stated that he has a job and there is not a conflict of interest a conflict would be if it was for financial gain or the potential of financial gain he is governed by civil service rules and a union contract the steering committee is not a conflict of interest. Arnold stated that Gary is not happy with him and he chooses to make this a personal issue. The vote on the motion to establish bi weekly board of corrections meetings was taken. Arnold, Lancaster, Lanfear, Purdy, Quandt, Richardson and Schuppan al voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. 11 DISCUSS AND TAKE ACTION ON REQUEST FOR INPUT ON LEGISLATIVE INTERIM STUDY (LR228) OF THE COMMISSION OF INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS 7