My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
April 24, 2012
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2012
>
April 24, 2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2012 2:03:24 PM
Creation date
6/14/2012 2:03:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
County Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
9:05 A.M. Heid a board of Equalization mesting. ' <br /> 9:46 recessed the Baard of Equalization meeting and retumed ta the regular meeting. <br /> PUB�IC PARTICIPATION - Chairman Lancaster called for public participation and no ane <br /> respanded. <br /> 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY — CONSIDERATION UF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN <br /> HALL & HC�WARD COUNTIES FUR JUVENILE DIVERSION SERVICES AND, <br /> AUTHORIZATION �F CHAIR TO SIGN THE SAME — Deputy County Attorney Jack Zitterkopf <br /> stated that this is the inter lacal agreement with Howard County for the juvenile services. It has <br /> been approved by the Howard County B�ard of Cammissioners. The previous agreemen# was <br /> for $4 as oppased to this agreement of $2,OOO.QO. Hall County will receive the <br /> $2,000.00 at the beginning of the fiscal year and charge the same fees far each participant that <br /> is charged in Hall Caunty. They are also reviewing the fees that are charged and will set up a <br /> new fee schedule. <br /> Quandt stated that this is a gaod agreement. Quandt made a motion and McFarland seconded <br /> to authorize the chair to sign the interlocal agreement with Howard County for the juvenile <br /> services. <br /> Ziola questioned item 4 if the county attorney is a party to the agreement. Discussion was held <br /> and this is more of a directive. <br /> The vote on the motion to approve the agreemEnt was taken. Amold, Lancaster, McFarland, <br /> Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan, and Ziola all voted yes and nonE voted no. Motion carried. <br /> GOUNTY ATTORNEY — EXECUTIVE SESSION REGARDING STRATEGY FOR THE <br /> ELLIS/LITTLE E EAGLE CONDEMNATION APPEAL — Mr. Zitterkapf stated that his second <br /> item is a request fior an executive session for the condemnation appeal. <br /> Arnald made a motion and Purdy seconded to go into executive sessian regarding the <br /> condemnation appeal. This execu#ive session is to protect the public interest. Arnald, <br /> l�ancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan, and Ziola all vated yes and none voted no. <br /> Motian carried. � <br /> 9:55 a.m. executive session Cas�y Sherlock was invited to attend the executive session. <br /> 10:35 a.m. Arnald made a mation and Quandt seconded to go out of the executive session. <br /> Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan, and Ziala all voted yes and no one <br /> voted na. Motion carried. Charman Lancaster stated that no action was taken and the only item <br /> tha# was discussed was the item for the executive session. <br /> 10:35 a.m. reconvened the Board of Equalixation meeting � <br /> 10:40 a.m. returned to the regular board meeting. <br /> 8 DISCUSSION REGARDING BISMARK ROAD CLOSING — Mr. McFarland stated that he has <br /> received several phone calls from the east lakes area concerning Bismark Road. When it was <br /> originally announced the closing was t� be 5 weeks but it has now been 9 w�eks. The area , <br /> residents are being affected by this project. Arnold noted that this is a railroad project and the � <br /> 2 ��I <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.