Laserfiche WebLink
j ` . <br />20110358� <br />DESCRIPTION OF COMPATIBLE EFFECTS OF GRAZING <br />The Rainwater Basin ecosystem was originally a grassland-dominated landscape that evolved <br />under the influences of grazing by ungulates (bison, deer, pronghom, and elk) as well as fire, <br />drought and other climatic forces. Grazing by livestock in these prairie wetlands replicates a <br />natural process and can be prescribed to maximize wetland functions and values by maintaining <br />a healthy mix of grassland habitats, including in a diversity of vegetative structure and species, <br />encouraging desirable early successional wetland plants, and creating open water and mud flats. <br />Grazing can also be a tool to help control invasive vegetation which is often a significant threat <br />to wetland functions. For example, grazing following a fire treatment, also known as <br />patch-burn grazing will often help to suppress undesirable species such as reed canarygrass or <br />hybrid cattail. <br />A diversity of vegetative stntcture is desired to maximize habitat functions by providing a <br />variety of habitat conditions needed by different species at difFerent sta.ges in their lifecycle. <br />This desired diversity in vegetative structure, including vegetative height, density, and species <br />composition, that will meet the various habitat requirements of the target wildlife species can be <br />achieved through properly managed grazing. Grazing effects include both what the grazer eats <br />and trampling effects from hoof action. <br />For example, on some sites, especially those with adequate upland buffer, residual cover <br />from the previous growing season averaging 8-16 inches in height in April through July <br />may be necessary to attract nesting migratory song birds. On some sites, short <br />vegeta.tion averaging less than 2 inches in height in March/April during spring migration <br />or in October during fall migration may be appropriate within wetlands to allow <br />migrating waterfowl and shorebirds ready access to shallow water and mud flats for <br />feeding. Management needed for each wetland will vary, but generally, a high stocking <br />rate and short duration grazing period is preferred. Timing should vary from year to year <br />to accommodate a diversity of plant species. On larger wetlands (i.e. greater than 160 <br />acres), a portion of the enrolled lands should be grazed every year to provide a variety of <br />habita.t structure across the area. For smaller tracts (i.e. less than 160 acres), it may be <br />more appropriate to graze the unit as part of a rotational grazing management system <br />with other lands or graze in alternate years. However annual grazing may occur if timing <br />and intensity are adjusted accordingly to meeting wildlife and vegetation objectives. <br />Different grazing management prescriptions may be needed for different wetland types <br />and any surrounding uplands. <br />Each habitat type (temporary wetland, seasonal wetland, semi-permanent wetland, upland <br />prairie, etc.) has the potential to support different wildlife species, ranging from migratory birds <br />to amphibians and pollinators, and management of these sites will strive to maximize wetland <br />and wildlife habitat benefits on the WRP easement area. <br />The Parties hereby agree that the grazing of the easement area is a management tool necessary to <br />achieve the desired wetland functions and values. The Landowner agrees to conduct grazing <br />activity in accordance with the terms and conditions identified in this Exhibit and the grazing <br />management plan which is a component of the Wetlands Reserve Plan of Operations (WRPO) <br />developed with NRCS. The WRPO will identify the different wetland and upland habitats that <br />aze to be restored and maintained on the easement area, and thus guide the grazing management <br />requirements necessary to manage these habitats. <br />