Laserfiche WebLink
~ooaosso~ <br />feed line for Load Line 4, all the pipes inspected were constructed of metal. The northeast water <br />main feed line was constructed of transite. Transite is a term for asbestos.containing cement. <br />The pipe was not tested for asbestos content, but is assumed to contain asbestos. All field tests <br />for explosives were negative and all water supply lines were left in place with the excavations <br />backfllled. <br />(c) Approximately 7,9401inear feet of vitreous clay industrial and sanitary sewers were <br />excavated and removed from the building footprints to the fenced boundaries of the load. line. <br />The sewer lines were removed up to a safe distance from the building footprints to preserve the <br />structural integrity of the buildings, with approximately 1,800 linear feet of sewer line left in <br />place to be removed later. At the fenced boundary the sewers were capped as they exited the <br />load line. <br />(d) Along with the utilities that were known from the as-built drawings, previously <br />unknown utilities that were discovered during geophysical investigation were inspected and field <br />screened for explosives. One of these pipes is described as a buried culvert pipe insulated with <br />asbestos. The insulation was sampled and analyzed and determined to contain 40% amosite <br />asbestos. This pipe runs from the east perimeter fence to the location of former Building L-10 <br />within Load Line 4. Through visual inspection and field screening, it was determined that the <br />pipe did not contain any explosives residues and the line was left in place with the excavation <br />backfilled. <br />(e) Limited sail screening was conducted beneath sewers, at an abandoned cesspool <br />location, and beneath anomalies identified in the geophysical survey to confirm that the lacations <br />did not contain greater than 10% explosives. Results for nearly all samples were below the <br />quantitation limit, that is, no detectable level of explosives was found. The highest value <br />detected was 0.00066% RDX (6,600 µg/kg) in a single sample. Because these results were far <br />below the value that is considered. an explosive safety hazard (greater than 10% explosives is <br />considered to be an explosive safety hazard), the soils beneath the sewer lines were left in place. <br />(f) During the July 2005 1to 2006 time frame, work was performed to disassemble, <br />decontaminate and demolish Load Line 4 buildings; remove concrete floor slabs; sample the soil <br />under former concrete slab lacations to confirm that the locations did not contain greater than <br />10% explosives; and to excavate and remove sanitary and industrial sewer lines that were close <br />to building foundations, followed by limited sail screening for explosives at the greater than 10% <br />level beneath former sewer locations. The highest concentration of explosives detected during <br />soil screening beneath the former slabs was 580,000 µg/kg 2,4,6-TNT or 0.058%. The highest <br />concentration of explosives detected during soil. screening beneath the former sewer locations <br />was 340 µg/kg 2,4,6-TNT. <br />(g) The goal of all of the above-identified actions from 2005 to 2006 was to obtain SX <br />certification for the load. line areas in accordance with U.S. Army Pamphlet IOCP 385-1 <br />Classification and Remediation of Explosive Contamination. The SX designation indicates that <br />9 <br />