200903045 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse

~~~ Jill ~ m n ~. ...~ c:=> o <n m ~ <::) ~ ~-~ % ');. 0-1 ." ." ~ C>.::l _ c: m (;; ~ c::::"J>- J"\) ~~B z (") "~' :D z-l ::0 ~~ ..".:~ -0 -i/T1 0 '" ~ J~' ::::0 C> m I\J ~ 0.. - -<0 c::::> 0 s tj -. N 0""'" )> -c _I ocn 0 W ""'t"1Z en s ~:J: ..., CD <0 '" tt~ :rrTl c:::>Z s r )t~ 0 :t>CO W f'T'l t -0 ,:::0 en l5 fTl 3 W:ri s z:. ;l:;: ~ 0 ,:t> .j:::.. () (fl ........ U) oC: ('JI 0 N ;:><; :s: :t> ~~ 2- C,..) .......,...........,... t+., I-' eft (I) z G' 0 ~ t:> _. ~'oi? 200903045 J';- '. IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF HALL COUNTY, NEBRASKA NGHI QUANG TRAN, ) CASE NO. CI08-1194 ) Plaintiff, ) ) DECREE OF DISSOLUTION VS. ) ) FILED CHRISTINE HA aIkIa ) TIEN THUY HA, ) FEB 0 2 2009 ) VALORIE BENDIXEN C'1 w Z ~ ~5 Defendant. ) CLERK OF DISTRICT COURT Cll.J... _ On the 29th day of January, 2009, this matter came on for trial upon the merits. Plaintiff was personally present and was represented by Sam Grimminger, lawyer. Also present was one Han Nguyen who acted as interpreter for Plaintiff. Defendant failed to appear personally and was not represented by counsel. The matter was heard before the Honorable Teresa K. Luther, District Judge. Plaintiff was sworn and his testimony was duly taken and entered and Exhibit 1, a Settlement Agreement was offered in evidence and received by the Court, whereupon Plaintiff rested. After due and proper consideration of the testimony, Exhibit I, the file, and the premises generally the Court does hereby find as follows: that Defendant was duly served with process and failed to answer or plead to the cause but joined in a Settlement Agreement designated and referred to hereinafter as Exhibit I; that Defendant was duly provided with notice of this proceeding, and either failed or elected not to appear. That the allegations in Plaintiff's Petition are substantially true and correct; that the marriage between the parties is irretrievably broken and should be dissolved; that the parties owned interest in real estate and personal property of both a tangible and intangible nature; that the parties have marital debts; that Exhibit 1 the Settlement Agreement entered into by the parties is fair. reasonable and not unconscionable. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED BY THE COURT AS FOLLOWS: 1. That the allegations in the Petition for Dissolution of Marriage are substantially true and correct; that the marriage between the parties is irretrievably broken p,-se-1=-of5- 1 IIIIII 000141667D08