82001390 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse

____ _, -- , ~„:: 82 --:6101'3 9 ~0 "~ ~- ._ ,__l ~~ Iti THE DISTRICT CQURT OF'THE ELE'dENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT IN AHII FOR HALL COUNTY, PdEBRASKr~ _- { .~ J?T ,;OVITA D. SPENCER-, Pe-ti tio'ner, _: ~ys_ DONALD E. SPENCER, RespandPnt. OECREE OF pTSSOLUTION Na. 1 $t#5i3- ~lJ~` HOW on this 2Sth day of June, 7974 thin matter aaae o.^, Fir hearing upon the-Pei;iton for Eega:7 Separation of the Petitioner and the: Responsi`-ve P}eading of the Respondent pray5ng'for a disso}utian of marriage. $oth parties were. present with cou-~se7 anal Petitioner waived offering evidence on her Petition for I.ega7 Separation, Respondent offered. evidence as to the allegations of his pleading and..after hearing the evidence offered by the parties and being fu77y advised in the matter, the Court. finds> orders and decrees as fa7,lc~~+rs; 7_. That 17etitianer elected in open cflurt not to offer evidence on her Petition. 2. That tae parties were married at Lncoln> Lancaster County, fVebrstca, nn June lJ, 7955., an4 tfiat the-par-ties are the ~area~ts of tfie four ~4} fa27o~irrg named chi 7'dren. Deanna M, Spenc~r> born Septea~ber 74, 195E, Deidre M. Spencer, born August 79, 7959, Dayna M. Spencer, born Augusta}, }961> and Da,nie} A. Spencer, barn April 29, }96Q. 3. 1"hat the marriage oi: the partesi~ irretrievably broken and thatthere are no chances of reconciliation a d said marriage is hereby disso7Vdd. ~. 'Fat the:Petitioner is a~uarded the care and custody of LEie parties' above named minor children and awa<rded chi.}d support in accordance with tns terms of the parties' Property Settlement and Agreement. 5. That the rea property of the p,a~ties descrbed as Lot ~nur lw}, tslnck T;:o (,'), C~apito Neiyhts Fourth 5ubdivi5inn, Hal} County, ^a~~raska, ?s c~?eteU iri Petitioner, su€~je,ct to encumbrance +: