83000235 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse

It3 TDR DISTRICT Cni7RT FOR 2HE Rt~~i JUL)IC7AL DISI~2ICT 1N AMID FOR HALT, ~iRdPl', I~ASRA AII,FN T, qty, ) Case No. 71-247 -~`'7~;Ct - ~ - T7FTtNITA R. CLAIVC]C, 1 Nt7W on this 16th day of October, 1979, the Petitioner being present in open court and beinc} represented bi' his Attorssey, Richard L. Luber, and the Res- pordent beissg absent, taut having been duly served Th' publication, the Court made the following findings: (1} That the court has jurisdiction of both parties atsd of the sub- ject mattes of this action. {2} That neither party is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States. {3~ That the court has deteuninerl fmn the evidence that every reason- able effort to effect reconciliation has been made, without s-t~cess, and that the marriage of Petitioner and Respondent is irretrievably broken. IT IB `~ ORDIIiEI1: That the marriage of ALT•ttu T. CT~Y9CSC and VERtIITA R. CLANCY is hereby dis~alva3 and that such dissolution shall not bacuoe final, except for purposes of appeal, far six months, to-wi.t: April 16, 1980, during v~ich time the ~rties *'~*~+ married to eats other. Tt'at the custody of the mimr childre¢a, IDIti'ATtD I~ CLAI~3C, born Septem- ber 18, 1965, SA1!ffiRA ADELL CI,A19C.'Y, born April 7. 1956, and WIISS.AM AIS~N CIAi3."'Y, barn 1Kay 1T, 1958, are ascended to the Petitioner, subject tc> right of reasonable visitation by the Wit. That the personal ~opea'ty now in the possession of each party should bs given unto the party in kdxsse possession the perscasal property now stands. That the follt~rus? desrxibed rc~l, estate be, and the sense hereby is, gt~iat~i ~ the name of the Petiti.Gtseac, ALLIIV T. Q,At+iCX, to-wit: IDt Fot~t~tt (14}, in Fractional Atoek One {1), in Park Hi11 ivisicxs, an Addition to the City of hand Island, Hall Ck~alty, 1+~,a: 1:ttw ~ 1s 1:, Ht~er•t#ii~itn St Msrs#tt Tttrzbt: #f2~2.+32i~ 1'. U. Ii~x {i16t3 15tr1 ~~'est 1rc.retJ ltrrrt ~raad lsiattcl, Nrfrraska CxE28Q1 ilI'.'Ff?~ I.ii ~