200703250 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse

200703250 Lot, Thirty-Three (33) Feet; thence West parallel with North line of Lot Four (4), Two Hundred Seventeen (217) Feet; thence South parallel with the West line of Lot Five (5), Twenty-Four (24) Feet; thence East parallel with the North line of Lot Five (5), Twenty-Five (25) Feet; thence south at right angles to a point Ninety-Three (93) Feet West of the Northwest comer of said Lot Five (5), Nine (9) Feet; thence East One Hundred Ninety-Two (192) Feet to the place of beginning Minus Mortgages Total Value (24,520.63) $110,379.00 The Court accepts the values and makes a determination of the disputed value of the Fourth Street property based upon the testimony, written evidence and viewing the witnesses and determining their credibility as to the particular issue. Petitioner is hereby granted judgement against Respondent in the sum 0[$30,015.00 to be payable in equal sums over 60 months starting Aprill, 2003, with the judgment to draw interest at the rate of 3.245%. 11. The Court has considered the alimony request ofthe Petitioner. The Court, from the evidence, awards no alimony. This is a marriage often year duration, eight years from the date of filing. The Court knows, from the evidence, that the Respondent has a painting business but knows nothing about the value of the painting business, only that it is a closed corporation with the Respondent owning all of the stock and the Respondent's salary which, was agreed upon by the parties, including rent, netting $3,183.57 monthly. The Court knows that the Petitioner has a degree in commercial art and prior to the children being born worked out ofthe home and worked some part time since the birth of the children. In addition to the degree in commercial art the Petitioner also has a cosmetology license and studied to obtain a real estate license but chose not to do so. That Petitioner is now going to school studying education at a community college and will get her associate's degree in 2004. The Court is aware that the Petitioner grosses $880 per month working on a part-time basis keeping financial records for her boyfriend's farming operation. The Court has no information concerning Petitioner's costs of living. The Court can glean from the evidence that Petitioner's present income situation is voluntary in providing services for her boyfriend and her own testimony concerning Petitioner's attempts, based upon her education and skill level, to obtain employment. The Court is aware, based upon the testimony of Petitioner's prior background, that she is capable of obtaining employment in a number of fields but has not