200109053 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse

200109053 Each building in the Project is and has been suitable for occupancy, taking into account local health, safety, and building codes (or other habitability standards), and the state or local government unit responsible for making building code inspections did not issue a report of a violation for any building or low- income unit in the project: ❑ YES ❑ NO If "No ", state the nature of violation on page 3 and attach a copy of the violation report as required by 26 C.F.R. 1.42 -5 and any documentation of correction. 9. There has been no change in the eligible basis (as defined in Section 42(d) of the Code) of any building in the Project since last certification submission: ❑ NO CHANGE ❑ CHANGE If "Change ", state nature of change (e.g., a common area has become commercial space, a fee is now charged for a tenant facility formerly provided without charge, or the Borrower has received federal subsidies with respect to the Project which had not been disclosed to the allocating authority in writing) on page 3: 10. All tenant facilities included in the eligible basis under Section 42(d) of the Code of any building in the project, such as swimming pools, other recreational facilities, parking areas, washer /dryer hookups, and appliances were provided on a comparable basis without charge to all tenants in the buildings: ❑ YES ❑ NO 11. If a low- income unit in the Project has been vacant during the year, reasonable attempts were or are being made to rent that unit or the next available unit of comparable or smaller size to tenants having a qualifying income before any units were or will be rented to tenants not having a qualifying income: ❑ YES ❑ NO 12. If the income of tenants of a low- income unit in any building increased above the limit allowed in Section 42(g)(2)(D)(ii) of the Code, the next available unit of comparable or smaller size in that building was or will be rented to residents having a qualifying income: ❑ YES ❑ NO 13. An extended low- income housing commitment as described in Section 42(h)(6) of the Code was in effect, including the requirement under Section 42(h)(6)(B)(iv) of the Code that an owner cannot refuse to lease a unit in the project to an applicant because the applicant holds a voucher or certificate of eligibility under Section 8 of the United States Housing Act of 1937, 42 U.S.C. 1437s. Owner has not refused to lease a unit to an applicant based solely on its status as a holder of a Section 8 voucher and the Project otherwise meets the provisions, including any special provisions, as outlined in the extended low- housing commitment (not applicable to buildings with tax credits from years 1987 - 1989): YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A 14. The Borrower received its credit allocation from the portion of the state ceiling set -aside for a project involving "qualified non - profit organizations" under Section 42(h)(5) of the Code and its non - profit entity materially participated in the operation of the development within the meaning of Section 469(h) of the Code. YES ❑ NO ❑ N/A 15. There has been no change in the ownership or management of the Project: NO CHANGE ❑ CHANGE If "Change ", complete page 3 detailing the changes in ownership or management of the Project. 16. The Borrower is not in default under the terms of the Agreement. 01- 351904.01 D -2