Laserfiche WebLink
costs. <br />201500633 <br />action in 2009, she had no contact with nor did she inquire about the marital assets <br />or debts. No evidence was presented that she had any contact with the child. <br />There was evidence that she did not pay any money to Defendant for the support <br />of the child. Defendant was forced to cash in his retirement account after he was <br />laid off from work and developed medical problems. In order to pay living <br />expenses, raise his son, and pay his medical bills he had to use the retirement <br />money. <br />Plaintiffs evidence valued all assets _ at the time of . the final hearing. No <br />evidence was presented as to the value of the assets in 2005, the time of <br />separation. By doing this she received the benefit of an increase in value of the <br />house of over $10,000. Likewise the vehicles were valued as of the time of trial. <br />Defendant's 401(k) account was no longer in existence at the time of trial and <br />there was no evidence contradicting his assertion that the proceeds were used for <br />family necessities. <br />Considering all factors, Plaintiff is entitled to receive: one -half the value of <br />the house with credit given to Defendant for mortgage payments made; and one- <br />half the value of the 1994 Nissan King Cab. <br />4. Alimony. Neither party is requesting alimony and none should be <br />awarded. <br />5. Attorney Fees. Each party should pay their own attorney fees and <br />Page of <br />