Laserfiche WebLink
201500633 <br />2. Dissolution of Marriage. The parties were married in 1979 in Viet <br />Nam, and there was one child born of this marriage and one child adopted by the <br />parties. Both children have reached the age of majority. The marriage of the <br />Plaintiff and Defendant is irretrievably broken and every reasonable effort to <br />effect a reconciliation has been made. The marriage should be dissolved. <br />3. Division of Marital Estate. During the marriage the parties have <br />acquired property and debts, and the Court should make an equitable distribution <br />of the property and debts. <br />The parties have placed at issue the family home, Plaintiffs and <br />Defendant's 401(k) accounts, a 1994 Nissan pickup and a 1996 Chevrolet <br />Cavalier, and gifts or loans from their son Tung T. Le. The history of the parties <br />since the separation complicates the property division. In 2005, Plaintiff moved to <br />South Carolina and had little or no contact with Defendant after the separation. <br />When the parties separated, their son Van Tuong Le, born in 1991, stayed with <br />Defendant in Grand Island, Nebraska, in the family residence. Plaintiff provided <br />no child support to Defendant for their son. <br />Plaintiff lives in South Carolina with her daughter by a prior relationship. <br />She is employed as a nail technician and earns approximately $10,000 per year. <br />Defendant worked at Overhead Door in Grand Island earning approximately <br />$25,000 per year until he was laid off in 2009. He has been unable to work since <br />that time and his only source of income is $897 per month from social security <br />disability payments. <br />Page <br />