My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
004-355
LFImages
>
Deeds
>
Misc Book-Page
>
004
>
004-355
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/12/2012 10:40:18 AM
Creation date
4/6/2012 2:51:32 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Deeds_Misc_Book_Page
book-page
004-355
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
III THE DISTRICT COURT OF, HALL cOWTY, !IFBPJ3KA <br />OTTO BMMOOD and ), <br />yIN?jIF BUP1100L,) <br />Fla in t t.ff 3, Case NO. 13,!R45 <br />JOURNAL EITRY • <br />us <br />DEF;�,'Y OLIVER, and RUTH <br />O.L I VFR , <br />Defendants <br />Now on this nineteenth day Of Lecer�,111-er, 1956y the <br />same being one of the judicial days o,,, the regular term <br />of the District court of Hall County, Nebraska, this <br />cause came on to be heard; the Plaintiffs bein-y prese-;t <br />in open Court in person and by Harold �. -Prince, their <br />Attorney., and the Defendants being present by Dezney <br />Oliver, Sr., one of the Lefendants, aid John V. Jensen, <br />their Attorney; whereupon said cause caille on to be <br />heard and evidence ",8 introduced, whereupon tine Court <br />did take this case under aduisement. <br />And nox, on this _64 day of January, being <br />one of the judicial dat,,s of the same ter,.,-,. o,)"' the Dist <br />riot Court, the Court beinr7 fl-illy advised in the premises <br />noun finds as follow , to-Wit: <br />The Court finds generally in favor o,,Y' the iluintiffs <br />and against the Defendants; and that aZlegationS con- <br />tained in the Petition n.,P the flajnti.!'.fs and Reply to <br />Answer and Answer to Cross Petition are true,, and finds <br />against the Defendants on the allegations contmined in <br />their Answer and Cross-petition. <br />The Court ,further finds that the Flainttf,fs are en- <br />titled to the relief prayed ,for, and that Defendants <br />are not entitled to relief prayed for in their Cross- <br />Petition. <br />'J <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.