006-040 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse

NX _..._...._. T_MEAUGUSTINEM 8421-5 -33 .x-. And the court further finds that said legacy of $2500.00 to Anna Huntzinger has been paid, and that said estate, both real and personal, descends in four equal shares; that is to say, one char to the children of Emma lothermel; one share to the children of Mrs. R.A.Clark, one share to the i children-of Mrs. William Headley, and one share to the children of William Huntznger. The court further finds from the evidence and the proof submitted that Emma Rothermel left sur- viving her the following named hefts: Mrs. Carrie Clarke, William S.Rothermel, Mrs.Nellie Erney, Mrs. Mae Williams, Mrs. Jean Patrick, Mrs.Martha Thomas,_Mr.Harry Rupp and Mrs.Dorothy Holdren. { It appears from the proof submitted that Mrs. Nellie Erney, Mrs. - N&e Williams, Mrs. Jean Patrick, ' Mrs. Martha Thomas, ,Mr.Harry_Rupp and Mrs. Dorothy Holdren are children of Mrs.Albert Rupp, who was a daughter of Emma Rotthermel, deceased, and that Mrs. Albert Rupp is now deceased and left Esurviving no husband. The court finds that the respective share of the heirs of Mrs. Emma Rother mel in the estate is as follows: Mrs. Carrie Clarke- - - - - -1/12 William S.Rothermel- - - - - 1/12 Mrs. Nellie Erney - - - - - 1/72 Mrs. Mae Williams - - - - - -1/72 Mrs. Jean Patrick - - - - - -1/72 Mrs. Martha Thomas - - - - - 1/72 Mr.Harry Rupp - - - - - - - 1/72 Mrs. Dorothy Holdren - - - - 1/72 The court further finds from the proof of heirship submitted that Mrs. William Headley named in the Will is now deceased and that her husband is also deceased, and that she left as her heir at law and only heir at law) a son, Charles N.Headley, I find, therefore, that the interest of said heir in said estate is as follows: Charles N.Headley - - - - - 1/4 The Court .further finds from the proof submitted that Mrs. ]Robert A.Clark was a sister of Mary S. Wells, deceased; that she is dead and that her husband is also dead, and that she left_as her heirs at law her two children as follows: Mrs. Frank Turner and Mrs. A.M. Sides, and the court finds that said heirs take jointly an undivided one- fourth interest in said estate and their respective interest are as follows: Mrs. Frank Turner - - - - - - 1/8 Mrs. A.MSides - - - - - - - - 1/8 The court further finds from the evidence that William Huntzinger is deceased and that his wife is-dead; and that he left surviving him the following children: Mrs. Marjorie Hudson, Mrs. Annie Schlegle, Fred Huntzinger, Arthur Huntzinger and Louis Huntzinger. It appears from the evidence that Louis Huntzinger is deceased, and there is no evidence showing whether or not he left any Child or children surviving him. The court, therefore, finds that the interests of the respeeti parties in the estate of Mary S.Wells to be as follows: Mrs. Marjorie Hudson - - - -1/20 Mrs. Annie Schlegle - - - - - -1/20 Fred Huntzinger - - - - - - - -1/20 Arthur Huntzinger - - - -1/20 Louis Huntzinger, or his heirs in the event he is now deceased and has no heirs surviving him -+ - - - - - - - - - - - - -1 /20 The court further finds that in the event Louis Huntzinger is deceased and left no children sur- viving him, then his 1/20 interest would be inherited by the other four children, his brothers i and sisters. The Court further finds from the evidence introduced that the heirs of Mary S.Wells have asked the firm of Prince & Prince to act as their Agent in the future handling of the property until other arrangements can be made, and the court finds that said W.A.Prince, as Executor, has by j I virtue of said arrangement lawful authority to assign and transfer to the firm of Prince & Prince as Agent for the heirs of Mary S.Wells, deceased, the residue of the personal property of said estate and to take charge of the real estate. r