|
6U�
<br />42654- RLOPPA SARTLETTCO.,PRINTING.LITHOGR A PHI MG. STATIONERY: OMAHA
<br />DE CREEL
<br />---- Be it remembered, That on the 26th day of March 1915, that being one of the days
<br />of the February Term 1915 of the District Court of the 11tH Judicial District of the State of
<br />Nebraska, within and for the County of Hall, held at the Court House.in the City of Grand Island,
<br />before Hon. James N. Paul, one of the Judges of the said District, the following among other pro-
<br />ceedings were had in the words and figures following; to- wit:,-
<br />In the District Court of Hall County, Nebraska,
<br />Elise Keuscher, Julia Cornelius, Vary Reher, )
<br />George Lorenzen Jr., Elise Detlefsen, and Arthur }
<br />C. layer, (Administrator of the Estate of Louis )
<br />Lorenzen, Deceased) )
<br />---- vs - - -- )
<br />John C. Lorenzen, Louis C. Lorenzen, George )
<br />Lorenzen, and Marie Cornelius, )
<br />Now on the 25th day of March, 1915, being on_ of the days of the regular
<br />Marie Cornelius
<br />February Term of the said Court, this cause coming on further to _be heard, the said defendant,
<br />filed her answer and declaimed any interest in the property in controversy and asked that the
<br />case as to her, might be dismissed and she be released from the payment of costs; and coming/,fur-
<br />ther to be heard on the motion of Elise Keuscher, Julia Cornelius, Mary Reher, George Lorenzen
<br />Jr., Elise Detlefsen, and Arthur.C. Mayer, Administrator, plaintiffs aforesaid, to strike from
<br />the defendants answer and cross bill certain parts thereof, the said plaintiffs and each.thereof
<br />being represented by their attorneys, Arthur C. Mayer and B enj. J. Cunningham and the defendants
<br />John C. Lorenzen and Louis C. Lorenzen by their attorneys, Fred W. Ashton and W. H. Thompson. The
<br />Court after hearing; the arguments and being fully advised in the premises, over -ruled the said
<br />motion, to which ruling the said plaintiffs excepted; and the said cause coming on further to be
<br />r
<br />heard, the said defendants George Lorenzen failed to appear or answer and having been duly and
<br />legally served with summons in this case, the time to plead having long since passed, was thrice
<br />called in open court, but appeared not and made default and the default of the said George Loren-
<br />zen is hereby entered.
<br />The said plaintiffs tgrough their attorneys aforesaid, asked leave of 'Court to file a reply
<br />to the said answer and cross bill of the said John C. Lorenzen and Louis C. Lorenzen as amended.
<br />Leave was granted and reply immediately filed; tqe said cause coming on further to be heard on the
<br />said original petition of the said plaintiff and the said answer and cross -bill as amended, of the
<br />said defendants John C. Lorenzen and Louis C. Lorenzen and the rep -l.y of the plaintiff thereto and
<br />the evidence.
<br />The said plaintiffs appearing in Court in person and by their attorneys Mayer and Cunning-
<br />ham aforesaid and the said defendants, John C. Lorenzen and Louis C. Lorenzen in person and by
<br />their a ±torneys Ashton and Thompson aforesaid, the said Marie Cornelius in person anci by her a-
<br />foresaid answer and disclaimer; the taking of testimony was commenced and proceeded with until
<br />the arrival of 6 o'clock when the taking; of further testimony was continued until 9 o'clock A.M.,
<br />March 26;1915-
<br />Now on this 26th day of 1.1arch, 1915, this cause coming; on further to be heard, uponlevidenee,
<br />cause was closed and submitted to the Court without argument, and the Court being fully advised
<br />in the premises on the.consideration thereof, finds on the issues joined in favor of the defen-
<br />dants, John C. Lorenzen and Louis C. Lorenzen and against the plaintiffs and each thereof, and
<br />against the defendants George Lorenzen and Marie Cornelius.
<br />That the facts stated in the amended answer and crossbill of the said defendants, John C.
<br />Lorenzen and Louis C. Lorenzen are true, and that the facts stated in the said petition of the
<br />aforesaid plaintiffs which are not admitted specifically in the said answer and erossbillAnot true.
<br />1
<br />
|