|
F
<br /> 3��
<br /> ����������'���� ������� �
<br /> �
<br /> .�__________� �._ ___._ _
<br /> ._ . _ .
<br /> 74RRd-STpl�,JOURNAL COMPAN1L�I,NCOLN N6,8,_,^_--��. � _
<br /> � ject a,nd prayer of wi�ich are to foreclose a certain mortgage deed executed by Oscar Lompe
<br /> and Pauline Lompe ,husband and wife ,to THE SECURITY �iUTUAL LIFE INSURAN�E COMPANY,� corporati ,
<br /> ; covering the following described real estate ,to-wit:
<br /> I The East Half (E�) of the Southwest Quarter ( S�Y�) of section twenty-nine (29) in to�rnship
<br /> I ten ( lU) North Range eleven (11) West of the 6th P.M. in Hall County ,Nebraska.
<br /> �
<br /> ; 3aid mortgage deed was dated the 2� day of June ,1923 ,and was filed for record in the
<br /> i office of the Register of Ueeds for Hall County ,Nebra.ska,on the 14th day of July,1923 ,and wa
<br /> ; 1 recorded in book 5� of Mortgages at page 3�+1.
<br /> I
<br /> Pla.intiff alleges tnat there is due upon the note ,which said mortgage deed was given to
<br /> secure the su:n of FIV�' THOUSAND ��'E HUNDRED THIRTY SEVEN AND 50/100 Dollars ( �5z37.50) to-
<br /> gether with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent per annum fram the 2�th day of Dec-
<br /> I �
<br /> I � emiaer ,ly27 ,and tne furtner sum for taxes as alleged in plaintiff s petition. Plaintiff asks
<br /> � �
<br /> that the same may be declared a lien upon tne said premiees and that said premises may be so d
<br /> � to satisfy the sa�e. �
<br />'. • I .
<br /> .�•- � Dated tnis 24 day of October ,192�.
<br /> I�•.
<br /> THE SECURITY �JTUAL LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY,
<br /> Plaintiff ,
<br /> By Fizld Ricketts & RicKetts
<br /> Horth Cleary & Suhz
<br /> , - Attorneys for Plaintiff,
<br /> �
<br /> Filed for record tt�is 2�+ day of pctober 192� ,at 2: 20 0' c7.ock P.�d.
<br /> � ��� ��
<br /> � ��egister��eec�s�
<br />� �
<br />� � �..
<br />� -�-0-0-0-0-0-J-0-0-0-�-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-�-0-u-�-�-0-0-�-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0-0 0
<br /> DECREE
<br />�
<br /> �
<br /> BE IT RE�IEN�BERED that on tnis 29th day of October, 192� ,that being one of t he d�,ys of the
<br /> � Septe:nber Iy2� ter�n of the District Court of the Eleventh Judicial District ,held in and for
<br /> iriall County ;jlebra,ska.,the' �'ollowing �,mong others was had in tiaords and fi�;ures as follows ,tow t ;
<br /> I I'�? THE DI STRZ CT COURT OF HALL COUNTY,NEBRA SKA
<br /> I
<br /> Alice P.Tnonpson
<br /> Plaintiff
<br /> vs
<br /> DECREE
<br /> G.D2.Dodge ,Agent and Trust ee
<br /> for U. P.R.R. Co. ,et al. )
<br /> )
<br /> �ef endant5. )
<br /> ! Now on this 29th day of October ,192� ,this cause came on for hearing ,and the° defendants
<br /> � and each of them,being thrice calledin open court ,came not ,but made default; and it appearing
<br /> i
<br /> ' to the court that Union Pacific Ra,ilro�,d �ornpany,a corporation organized under the laws of
<br /> �
<br /> ; the State of Utah,one of the defendants in t�is action,has filed a disclaimer ,and tnat the
<br /> rernaining defendants ,and all persons having or claiming any interest in Fractional Lot 5 in
<br /> ;
<br /> � Fractional Block 117 ,Railroad Addition to Grand Island,and Fractional Lot 5 in Fractional
<br /> ;
<br /> � Block 117 ,of Koenig & �'�iebe � s Addii�ian to Grand Isla.nd,or eitner of said Fractional Lots ,
<br /> i
<br /> � real na.;nes unknown ,defenc�ant� ;have beer�served by publication in the manner and form� provided
<br /> � by Iaw; And t.ze court havin�; exa.mir� d tize files in ti�is action ,finds tnat tne defendants nave
<br /> �
<br /> �
<br /> i been served in the ma-nner and form provided by Iaw ,�.nd that service on said defendants ,ar�i
<br /> j
<br /> � each and aIl of them,is valid and legal;now,therefore ,a. default is taken against each and
<br /> I
<br /> � aIl of tnP defend�nts ,except said disclaiming defendant .
<br /> I . '
<br /> � An3 said cause came on furttier to be heard,the plaintiff being present in person,by
<br /> I
<br /> ria.rold A.Prince her Attorney,and the said Harold A.Prince ,being first duly sworn ,in a,�en
<br /> i
<br /> �
<br /> court testified in said a,ction,and the court being fuZly advised in the premises ,upon said
<br /> evidence2the �leadin�s filed in said case ,and after having neard the argument of counsel ,
<br /> �
<br />
|