�0�_ �
<br /> ��f���'��,��1�'���� ���'��� �
<br />� _. - _==__=p-��-�
<br /> ______^___ __
<br /> . �I4SB4-S7A7'E JOURNAL COMPANY,LINCOLN,NfiB �� � � - � � �
<br /> one time the owners of said premises and that on the 17th day of March 1���,they conveyed
<br />' � by their warranty deed,duly acknowledged on the 17th day af �ia,rch,l���+,and filed for record
<br /> � and recorded in Book M at Pa e 1
<br /> �� , g 37 of deeds ,of the xecords of the �e�ister of Deeds of
<br /> I! �all County ,Nebraska,on the 25th day of Ddarch,l���,all of their ri�ht ,title and interest in
<br />, � �
<br /> � and to said premisea to Levi H.�atchett ,but that through error of the par�ies there�o said
<br /> ,
<br /> � premises were incarrectly described as �,ot Six ( 6) in Block Seventeen (17) of Arnold and Abbo is
<br /> i
<br /> � Addition to the City of Grand Island,Nebraska,,with part of the Northeast Quarter (N�) of tY�e
<br /> i Southeast Quarter (SE�) of the 8outhwest Quarter {SW�) of Section Sixteen (16) ,Township
<br /> � Eleven (I1) ,Range Nine (9) ,�"�est ,and that eaid deed was intended to ,and did convey ,the said
<br /> jprenises as hereinabove described,and that said dise�epancy wae sim�Iy a misdescription of
<br /> ;
<br /> I
<br /> ; the said premises
<br /> � The court further finds ,that the defendants,Levi H.Matchett and Ella I�atchett ,his wife ,
<br /> �
<br /> � were at one time,the owners of said premises ,and that on the 2�th day of Pday 1��7,they con-
<br /> i
<br /> � veyed aIl their right title and interest in and to said pre;nises ,by 5gecial Warranty Deed,
<br /> ;
<br /> ' duly acknowledged on the 2�th day of DrIIay,1 ��7 ,and recorded in Book 6 of Deeds at Page 395
<br /> � of the records of the Register of Deeds o�' Hall County,Nebraska,on the 2�th day of I�ay ,
<br /> ; I��7 ,to �Pilliam �I.Geddes ,but thrn.0 error of the pa.rties hereto ,said premises were incorrectly
<br /> a described,but that said deed was intended to and did convey the premises herein referred to
<br /> j and hereinabove described,and that said discrepancy was simply a misdescription of said premi es.
<br /> ��
<br /> �� The court further finds t�iat ,William �.Geddes ,and Rena M.Geddes ,were at one time the
<br /> �.
<br /> ! owners of said pre�ises and that on the •27�Gh day of February ,1�90,they conveyed by their
<br /> �'
<br /> � Warranty Deed,duly acknowledged on the 27th day of February 1�90 ,and recorded in Book 13 at
<br />� i
<br /> ! page 505 of deeds,of the r ecords of the Register of Deeds of Hall County ,Nebraska,on the
<br /> �
<br /> {
<br />;
<br /> ' 27th day of February 1�90.a11 of their right title and interest in and to the premises herein
<br />�
<br /> referred to ,�o D.C. Chapman,but thru error said premises were incorrectly described and that
<br /> I�'� � said deed was intended to and did convey the premises herein above described,and that the
<br /> �
<br /> I �isct�ep�ancy in said deed was simple a misdescription of said premises.
<br /> � The court further finds that ,D. C. Chapman,a widow,was at one time the owner of said premiee ,
<br /> I
<br /> �� and that on the 15tn aa� of February 1902,he conveyed by Warranty need,duly acknowledged on
<br /> ��
<br /> � the l�th day of gebruary 1;�02,anct recorded in Boo� 35 at Page 126 of deeds ,of the r ecords
<br /> �i
<br /> ; of the R�gister of Deeds of Hall County ,Nebraska,on the �th day of �a.rch 1902,aII his right ,
<br /> i!
<br /> �� title and interest ,in and to said premises ,to Louis T.�3cGrath,but thru error of the parties �
<br /> !j thereto,said premises were incorrectly described,and that said deed was intended to and did
<br /> ;! convey the premises herein referred to and herein above described,and that said discrepancy j
<br /> �i was simply a misdescription of said premises.
<br /> !;
<br /> ,�
<br /> ;� The Court further finds,that t�ie plaintiffs and their immediate grantors throu whom they
<br /> � �
<br /> '( derived title,have been in open,notorious,continuome,exclusive ,adverse,hostile and undis-
<br /> ;,
<br /> '� turbed possession and occupancy of sa.id prem�..aes under claim of ownership and title thereto I
<br /> ,;!
<br /> E for more than twenty (20j years last past ,and that any right ,title or interest of the defend- ;
<br /> � i
<br /> ;� ants ,and each,and all of the them,and all persons claimin� an interest in eaid premises ,real �I
<br /> a� names unknown ,defendants ,have lon� since been barred by the Statute of Limitations and that
<br /> I
<br /> said pl�,in�iffs� title to said premises has now become absolute and plaintiffs are entitled �
<br /> I I
<br /> � to decree,affirming,confirming,and quieting their title and ownership in a.nd to said premises
<br /> ;
<br /> ,�
<br /> as against the defendants ,and each and alI of them and all persons clairqing an interest in
<br /> �
<br /> '! said premises ,real names ,unknown ,defendants ,or any person claiming,by,throu,or under an� of t erp.
<br /> ,�
<br /> �� IT IS,THerefore ,Ordered,Ajudged and Decreed Dy the Court ,that th� ownership,title and
<br /> ,; possession of the plaintiffs in and to said premises,to-wit;
<br /> �
<br /> ,,
<br /> E�
<br /> �. ��
<br />
|