Laserfiche WebLink
�0�_ � <br /> ��f���'��,��1�'���� ���'��� � <br />� _. - _==__=p-��-� <br /> ______^___ __ <br /> . �I4SB4-S7A7'E JOURNAL COMPANY,LINCOLN,NfiB �� � � - � � � <br /> one time the owners of said premises and that on the 17th day of March 1���,they conveyed <br />' � by their warranty deed,duly acknowledged on the 17th day af �ia,rch,l���+,and filed for record <br /> � and recorded in Book M at Pa e 1 <br /> �� , g 37 of deeds ,of the xecords of the �e�ister of Deeds of <br /> I! �all County ,Nebraska,on the 25th day of Ddarch,l���,all of their ri�ht ,title and interest in <br />, � � <br /> � and to said premisea to Levi H.�atchett ,but that through error of the par�ies there�o said <br /> , <br /> � premises were incarrectly described as �,ot Six ( 6) in Block Seventeen (17) of Arnold and Abbo is <br /> i <br /> � Addition to the City of Grand Island,Nebraska,,with part of the Northeast Quarter (N�) of tY�e <br /> i Southeast Quarter (SE�) of the 8outhwest Quarter {SW�) of Section Sixteen (16) ,Township <br /> � Eleven (I1) ,Range Nine (9) ,�"�est ,and that eaid deed was intended to ,and did convey ,the said <br /> jprenises as hereinabove described,and that said dise�epancy wae sim�Iy a misdescription of <br /> ; <br /> I <br /> ; the said premises <br /> � The court further finds ,that the defendants,Levi H.Matchett and Ella I�atchett ,his wife , <br /> � <br /> � were at one time,the owners of said premises ,and that on the 2�th day of Pday 1��7,they con- <br /> i <br /> � veyed aIl their right title and interest in and to said pre;nises ,by 5gecial Warranty Deed, <br /> ; <br /> ' duly acknowledged on the 2�th day of DrIIay,1 ��7 ,and recorded in Book 6 of Deeds at Page 395 <br /> � of the records of the Register of Deeds o�' Hall County,Nebraska,on the 2�th day of I�ay , <br /> ; I��7 ,to �Pilliam �I.Geddes ,but thrn.0 error of the pa.rties hereto ,said premises were incorrectly <br /> a described,but that said deed was intended to and did convey the premises herein referred to <br /> j and hereinabove described,and that said discrepancy was simply a misdescription of said premi es. <br /> �� <br /> �� The court further finds t�iat ,William �.Geddes ,and Rena M.Geddes ,were at one time the <br /> �. <br /> ! owners of said pre�ises and that on the •27�Gh day of February ,1�90,they conveyed by their <br /> �' <br /> � Warranty Deed,duly acknowledged on the 27th day of February 1�90 ,and recorded in Book 13 at <br />� i <br /> ! page 505 of deeds,of the r ecords of the Register of Deeds of Hall County ,Nebraska,on the <br /> � <br /> { <br />; <br /> ' 27th day of February 1�90.a11 of their right title and interest in and to the premises herein <br />� <br /> referred to ,�o D.C. Chapman,but thru error said premises were incorrectly described and that <br /> I�'� � said deed was intended to and did convey the premises herein above described,and that the <br /> � <br /> I �isct�ep�ancy in said deed was simple a misdescription of said premises. <br /> � The court further finds that ,D. C. Chapman,a widow,was at one time the owner of said premiee , <br /> I <br /> �� and that on the 15tn aa� of February 1902,he conveyed by Warranty need,duly acknowledged on <br /> �� <br /> � the l�th day of gebruary 1;�02,anct recorded in Boo� 35 at Page 126 of deeds ,of the r ecords <br /> �i <br /> ; of the R�gister of Deeds of Hall County ,Nebraska,on the �th day of �a.rch 1902,aII his right , <br /> i! <br /> �� title and interest ,in and to said premises ,to Louis T.�3cGrath,but thru error of the parties � <br /> !j thereto,said premises were incorrectly described,and that said deed was intended to and did <br /> ;! convey the premises herein referred to and herein above described,and that said discrepancy j <br /> �i was simply a misdescription of said premises. <br /> !; <br /> ,� <br /> ;� The Court further finds,that t�ie plaintiffs and their immediate grantors throu whom they <br /> � � <br /> '( derived title,have been in open,notorious,continuome,exclusive ,adverse,hostile and undis- <br /> ;, <br /> '� turbed possession and occupancy of sa.id prem�..aes under claim of ownership and title thereto I <br /> ,;! <br /> E for more than twenty (20j years last past ,and that any right ,title or interest of the defend- ; <br /> � i <br /> ;� ants ,and each,and all of the them,and all persons claimin� an interest in eaid premises ,real �I <br /> a� names unknown ,defendants ,have lon� since been barred by the Statute of Limitations and that <br /> I <br /> said pl�,in�iffs� title to said premises has now become absolute and plaintiffs are entitled � <br /> I I <br /> � to decree,affirming,confirming,and quieting their title and ownership in a.nd to said premises <br /> ; <br /> ,� <br /> as against the defendants ,and each and alI of them and all persons clairqing an interest in <br /> � <br /> '! said premises ,real names ,unknown ,defendants ,or any person claiming,by,throu,or under an� of t erp. <br /> ,� <br /> �� IT IS,THerefore ,Ordered,Ajudged and Decreed Dy the Court ,that th� ownership,title and <br /> ,; possession of the plaintiffs in and to said premises,to-wit; <br /> � <br /> ,, <br /> E� <br /> �. �� <br />