10-23-2001Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

( 01622 8a EXECUTIVE SESSION PERSONAL - Jeffries made a motion and Logan seconded to go into executive session. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. 10:17 a.m. executive session 10:25 a.m. Arnold made a motion and Logan seconded to go out of executive session. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. 9 CONTINUED DISCUSSION REGARDING JUVENILE SERVICES PLAN Lancaster made a motion and Arnold seconded to refer the juvenile services planning grant application to the juvenile services committee for a recommendation. Logan stated he would vote against this motion because he would like to see Mid Plains continue with the application process. Arnold expressed his concern on the letter from the crime commission and that the county needs to be involved in the process. The letter stated that there are conditions on the approval of the grant as it was submitted. He would like to have the juvenile committee to review the grant application and reapply. Lancaster stated this is not a negative remark, they only want the county involved and neighboring counties could also be involved. When Hall County puts their name on a grant the County Board needs to be involved. The committee will review the application and bring it back for the boards approval. The vote on the motion was taken. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries and Lancaster all voted yes and Logan voted no. Motion carried. CONTINUE DISCUSSION ON MOVING JUVENILE DIVERSION TO BEL TZER BUILDING - Jeffries made a motion and Logan seconded to approve moving the juvenile diversion office to the Beltzer building. Lancaster asked County Attorney Jerry Janulewicz if he had a recommendation and he stated that he had talked to Troy Chandler and reviewed the floor plans with him and Mr. Chandler did not have any objections. Logan expressed concern about having to move the office again if the probation office moved. Hartman questioned if the juvenile diversion department should be under the county attorney. He stated that if the diversion office were in the county attorney building Jerry Janulewicz would know if there were problems. It was suggested that the diversion committee have regular meetings with the director. Arnold expressed concern that putting the diversion office there may not be the best for the long-range plan. The vote was taken on the motion to approve moving the juvenile diversion office. Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and Arnold voted no. Motion carried. COMMENCE AUDIT OF MONTHLY CLAIMS AND ACTION ON CLAIM AUDIT: The board members reviewed the claims and Lancaster commented on the high medical expenses again this month. Lancaster made a motion and Jeffries seconded to approve the claims as audited and authorize the clerk to pay.