Laserfiche WebLink
<br />-- <br />r 01518 <br /> <br />2a DISCUSS AND TAKE ACTION APPROVING PROPOSED AGREEMENT BETWEEN <br />HALL COUNTY AND CANNON MOSS BRYGGER & ASSOCIATES PC FOR <br />ARCHITECTURAL & ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR BEL TZER BUILDING <br />REMODEL: It was requested to remove this item from the consent agenda motion for <br />discussion. County Attorney Jerry Janulewicz stated that Marvin Webb contacted him <br />this morning and he expressed a request that the county ask for bids on this project. <br />Janulewicz stated that according to the county purchasing act the county does not have <br />to bid out professional services, but the board can do this if they want. Cannon was the <br />original architect on this building he has done the remodeling on the building before. <br />Lancaster questioned if this wasn't discussed before and that because he had been the <br />original architect there was not any objection to use him for this remodeling project. <br />Cannon has all of the information on the building. Jeffries questioned if the 12.5% <br />architect fee was high and Arnold questioned if the fee is set where is the incentive to <br />keep the cost down. Janulewicz stated that the fee is higher for remodeling than for new <br />projects. Janulewicz stated that if the board wants him to make other phone calls he <br />would do so. Jeffries stated that as the building and grounds committee chair he was <br />not aware of this project proceeding. The remodeling needs to be done and the county <br />needs to develop a plan on how the building is to be used and what the county wants <br />done. Janulewicz stated that $500,000.00 was budgeted for the project but he does not <br />want to spend that much, he only wants to complete the project. Logan made a motion <br />and Lancaster seconded to hire Cannon Moss Brygger & Associates and to approve the <br />contract for the remodeling of the Beltzer Building. The board requested that Jerry stay <br />in touch with building and grounds committee. Lancaster stated that the county board <br />did convey to Jerry to get the project started. Chuck Kaufman stated that he did talk to <br />Jerry on this project. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan <br />all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />2c EXECUTIVE SESSION TO DISCUSS PENDING CLAIM AGAINS COUNTY OF <br />HALL DISCUSS POSSIBLE ACTION ON CLAIM FOR DOLD & BOHAN Eriksen made a <br />motion and Lancaster seconded to go into executive session. Arnold, Erikson, Hartman, <br />Humiston Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />9:30 a.m. executive session <br /> <br />9:47 a.m. Jeffries made a motion and Logan seconded to go out of executive session. <br />Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and <br />none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />This claim resulted from an erroneously purchased redemption certificate. Arnold made <br />a motion and Logan seconded to treat this as a tort claim and pay Bohan and Dold <br />$2,099.27 to settle the claim. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster <br />and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />County Attorney Jerry Janulewicz recommended that to clean up the matter the board <br />should rescind the previous action taken on July 10, 2001 to authorize the County <br />Treasurer to refund taxes. Arnold made a motion and Lancaster seconded to rescind <br />the previous motion from July 10, 2001. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, <br />Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Break 9:50 a.m. <br />