Laserfiche WebLink
<br />('20020492 <br /> <br />HALL COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MEETING AUGUST 29, 2002 <br /> <br />The Hall County Board of Supervisors met from recessed regular session August 29, 2002 at <br />9:00 a.m. <br /> <br />CALL TO ORDER - Chairman Lancaster called the meeting to order <br /> <br />ROLL CALL - Present on roll call were Scott Arnold, Jim Eriksen, Richard Hartman, Bob <br />Humiston, Bud Jeffries, Pamela Lancaster, and Lonnie Logan. Also present were <br />representatives from the Grand Island Independent and KRGI. <br /> <br />Lancaster stated that this meeting was from the recessed session on Tuesday. The items to be <br />discussed are the request from Stuhr Museum and the board received a request to add an <br />emergency item to the agenda to authorize the chair to sign the contract with West Group. <br /> <br />Arnold made a motion and Eriksen seconded to add the item concerning the contract from <br />West Group to the agenda. Arnold, Eriksen Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries, Lancaster and Logan <br />all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried <br /> <br />DISCUSSION AND FURTHER ACTION ON RESOLUTION WITH RESPECT TO A JOINT <br />RECREATIONAL PROJECT RELATING TO AN OPERATING TRAIN AT STUHR MUSEUM- <br />Executive Director Susan Gallagher was present and stated that the museum has had several <br />meetings since Tuesday regarding the request to place the bond issue on the ballot for the <br />November election. She stated that at the City Council meeting Tuesday evening Councilman <br />Gale Larson made a motion to prepare a business plan before they proceed with the election <br />process. The museum does not have the resources to prepare this type of a document and the <br />City has offered to assist with the business plan and preparing a cost analysis. Ms. Gallagher <br />stated the museum feels that this is very important and that is why she requested that the <br />County Board consider the resolution to rescind the motion to place this on the November <br />ballot. <br /> <br />Jeffries stated that he was appalled at this request. The museum goes to the city for the first <br />time and the City suggests a cost analysis and they want to pull the matter of the ballot. <br /> <br />Ms Gallagher stated that the museum wants to make sure that this will only be for 10 years and <br />not a tax burden to the people. She fees that they owe it to the community that the museum <br />will be able to support this project. She wants to do the right thing. <br /> <br />Eriksen questioned if the museum may be able to obtain grant money. Ms. Gallagher stated <br />that they would have to check on that. <br /> <br />Hartman questioned why they would have the City do the study. He suggested having some <br />one else and he doesn't think this will help. <br /> <br />Discussion was held on who would do the analysis. Pam Price stated that this would be an <br />independent opinion from the accounting firm Shonsey and Associates. They will do a cost <br />analysis of the construction and the entire project. They stated that they feel that it is important <br />to do this before they proceed with the project. <br />