Laserfiche WebLink
<br />( 20020:,9.3 <br /> <br />Eriksen stated that the new director is very conservative and the dollars that they have <br />budgeted are used to provide services but to do this they also need adequate space <br />Discussion was held on the fees that were paid for the architect. <br /> <br />Jeffries stated that the vote to move them to the county attorney building was made and <br />questioned why this discussion was being held again. <br /> <br />Jorgensen stated that if the decision were to move them to the county attorney building <br />they would accept it and move forward. <br /> <br />Logan made a motion and Arnold seconded to table any further discussion on this <br />matter until the long-range plan is completed. Arnold, Eriksen, Humiston, Lancaster and <br />Logan all voted yes and Jeffries voted no with Hartman absent for the vote. Motion <br />carried. <br /> <br />Hartman stated that a letter was sent to the health department concerning the county <br />attorney building and he thought it was accepted. He reminded the board that the <br />county bought a building and it was also turned down. He expressed concern that the <br />county may not receive the tobacco money because of the issues at the state level. <br /> <br />Break returned to session <br /> <br />7 LONG RANGE PLANNING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION - DISCUSS AND <br />APPROVE RFP FOR COURTHOUSE REMODELING AND SET BID OPENING - <br />Vic Aftenberge was present, he is the architect that did the plan for the courthouse <br />heating and air conditioning updates. He was contacted by the county board to do the <br />remodeling project for Judge Luther's office. He reviewed the plans with the board. <br />There will be changes in the jury room, two restrooms will be added, new floor <br />coverings, and cabinets in the judge's office, ceiling time, and some storage will be <br />provided. The heating and air conditioning will not be changed but some of the ducts will <br />be relocated. Some of the wiring will also be redone. He suggested a pre-bid <br />conference for July 24th at 9:00 a.m. Judge Luther stated that this date will work for her. <br /> <br />Jeffries made a motion to set the pre-construction meeting on the court house <br />remodeling for July 24 at 9:00 a.m. and to set the bid opening for August 13th, 2002 at <br />9:15 a.m. for the remodeling project. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Jeffries. <br />Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Eriksen stated that RDG will be here July 31 to meet with the city and he suggested <br />meeting with them at that time. Logan stated that the county needs to meet with RDG <br />outside of the restraints of the city. Eriksen questioned if the county has a contract with <br />RDG for this. The jail survey is an important part of the county's plan and the jail is a <br />part of the long-range plan. <br /> <br />Logan stated that he talked to Jerry Janulewicz and he did remember the interlocal <br />agreement, and he doesn't see a problem so the county can proceed. He suggested <br />looking at July 31st to meet with RDG. <br /> <br />Hartman - He stated that there was a long-range plan for the jail and if the city had not <br />Not been involved the county would have moved forward. The County is not any farther <br />ahead then they were two years ago. <br /> <br />6 <br />