Laserfiche WebLink
<br />(20020207 <br /> <br />Logan stated that a decision had to be made that would be good for the community and <br />for economic development. Designation for SPPD for heavy industrial is a good thing <br />and the county needs to take every opportunity for this development, but he feels that <br />there is still a way for compromise. He questioned why SPPD could not accomplish the <br />heavy industrial development without tract #27. Logan made a motion and Hartman <br />seconded to amend the designation and remove tract #27. Hartman questioned if the <br />property that was purchased by DTE was on the tax roles. Discussion was held <br />concerning the status of land owned by a government entity and who would have to pay <br />taxes. <br /> <br />The vote on the amendment to remove tract #27 from the designation to SPPD was <br />taken. Hartman and Logan voted yes and Arnold, Eriksen, Humiston, Jeffries and <br />Lancaster voted no. Motion failed. <br /> <br />The vote on the original motion to designate tracts # 26, part of 27, 36 and 37 to SPPD <br />and to approve Resolution #02-0030 was taken. Arnold, Eriksen, Humiston, Jeffries, <br />Lancaster and Logan all voted yes and Hartman voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />7 <br />