My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-21-2003Minutes
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2003
>
10-21-2003Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/14/2005 3:32:45 PM
Creation date
1/14/2005 3:32:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
County Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />,/ <br />r 0365~/ <br /> <br />this next phase of the jail project. The public needs to know what the base facility will be <br />and the costs. Their firm can assist with this next phase. Mr. Baines stated they have <br />has a lot of success with the pre-designs and the more specific the pre-design is the <br />more successful the project will be. Hall County needs to define what is needed for the <br />facility. <br /> <br />Mr. Baines suggested using the study that the county has and define the type of facility, <br />the number of beds and a site. Their firm can put together a proposal for a pre-design <br />phase and a time schedule to move forward with the project. <br /> <br />Arnold stated that he was unable to attend the long-range planning meeting. If the <br />county asks the people to vote for a bond issue they need to be sure of the design and <br />the cost and the board needs assistance to start this process. Mr. Baines stated that <br />they could do the pre-design phase to meet the needs of the county. He stated that they <br />do not charge on a percentage basis and there is a professional division between the <br />pre-design and architectural design phase. The pre-design plan needs to stand on its <br />own They will do the best work for the given task and if the county wants a third party to <br />oversee the construction phase they can do so. <br /> <br />Eriksen questioned what services they could offer. Mr. Baines stated that they are both <br />an architectural firm and engineering firm and they also have the resources available for <br />the construction phase. They can assist the county to define what type of building is <br />needed. They can move to the next phase and assist with the site, infrastructure and <br />develop a general idea of the building. This information will be used to form a defensible <br />and creditable plan for the county. <br /> <br />Hartman quested if they do the first phase and they proceed with the phase two <br />construction would there be a cost savings. Mr. Baines stated that their firm would credit <br />these costs against the total cost of the project. The costs are 100% transferable to <br />phase two. Hartman stated that he does not think a construction manager is necessary. <br />If the county is satisfied with one firm then they should let them proceed with the rest of <br />the project. <br /> <br />Lancaster stated that the board has had discussion about a construction manager, but <br />has not made a decision. The board would welcome a proposal from DLR for the pre- <br />design phase. Possibly the long-range planning committee could meet with them <br />concerning the proposal then the committee could come back to the board with a <br />recommendation. Hartman suggested a work-study session could be held. <br /> <br />Jeffries questioned if Nebraska Jail standards would have to be involved and Mr. Baines <br />stated they would have some involvement, but there is a working relationship with them <br />and they do have some input, but this is not a problem. He stressed the importance of <br />the site selection and stated they can assist with this in the pre-design phase. <br /> <br />Arnold made a motion and Eriksen seconded to request DLR to submit a proposal to the <br />long range planning committee for the pre-design phase for the jail project. The long <br />range planning committee will come back with a recommendation to the full board. <br />Discussion was held on scheduling the meeting. They will try to set the meeting up <br />when the board meeting adjourns. Arnold, Eriksen, Hartman, Humiston, Lancaster and <br />Rye all voted yes and none voted no, with Jeffries absent for the vote. Motion carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.