My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/03/2019
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2019
>
09/03/2019
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/31/2020 9:14:08 AM
Creation date
1/31/2020 9:13:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Marriage License
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lancaster noted that at the August 22 budget meeting the proposal was made to give the <br /> stipend to Ms. Carstensen and she thought it was satisfactory with Marty. <br /> w <br /> Mr. Klein said he could not tell the county boards how to spend taxpayers' dollars but he did not <br /> say that this was acceptable. There was one increase and then this would be a second rise. <br /> This would undermine his ability to manage his office. There are other people doing additional <br /> work in his office. When the board consider this stipend it is not good for his office. <br /> Lancaster noted that the discussion in executive session she felt he did not have a problem with <br /> this. This was not in his budget but she ask if the board had another avenue would he have a <br /> problem. She did not think he did. <br /> Mr. Klein stated that he is making it clear now that he does not support this. . <br /> Richardson everyone will have a different interpretation and now that Marty is not ok with this it <br /> would be a misstep for the boar to make this stipend. Sarah does wonderful job but this is <br /> something that Mr. Klein dos not support <br /> Mr. Fegley stated that even if this is in the justice system budget it does not mean that the <br /> county has to spend it. He does not want to change the budget document at this point. <br /> Lancaster can still make the motion to not spend the dollars <br /> Richardson has had some more issues with this but need to make sure what was said. <br /> Lancaster this is not unusual when Jerry Janulewicz was keno administrator and was County <br /> Attorney he could not accept that. <br /> Marty also noted that Jerry did have a stipend but the county attorney at that tie recommended <br /> that he not accept a stipend. The dollars were put aside to be used for office furniture for the <br /> attorney's office. <br /> Marty stated Sarah is doing stellar work and this is not a reflection on her, but so are others in <br /> his office. <br /> Quandt stated that he made the motion for the stipend but does not want to circumvent his <br /> office. He appreciates what she does and she is saving money for the county. <br /> Butch the intent to be nice but highway sheriff everyone is working hard cannot single out one <br /> person should have been left up to Marty <br /> Quandt made a motion and Bredthauer seconded to go out of the public hearing. Bredthauer, <br /> Hurst, Lancaster, Quandt, Peterson and Richardson all voted yes and none voted no. Hartman <br /> was absent. <br /> Hurst made a motion and Richardson seconded to rescind the offer to Sarah Carstensen for the <br /> additional pay for addition work from the justice budget. <br /> Lancaster noted that this was based on the objection from County Attorney Marty Klein. <br /> Bredthauer, Hurst, Lancaster, Quandt, Peterson and Richardson all voted yes and none voted <br /> no. Hartman was absent. Motion carried. <br /> 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.