Laserfiche WebLink
That Article 3: General Regulations,be amended to add a new subsection 3.29 as follows: <br /> Section 3.29 Adult Establishment Regulations <br /> Section 3.29.01 Purpose; Findings and Rationale <br /> 1, Purpose. It is the purpose of this resolution to regulate adult establishments in order to <br /> promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the County, and to establish <br /> reasonable and uniform regulations to prevent the deleterious secondary effects of adult <br /> establishments within the County. The provisions of this resolution have neither the purpose <br /> nor effect of imposing a limitation or restriction on the content or reasonable access to any <br /> communicative materials, including sexually oriented materials. Similarly, it is neither the <br /> intent nor effect of this resolution to restrict or deny access by adults to sexually oriented <br /> materials protected by the First Amendment, or to deny access by the distributors and <br /> exhibitors of sexually oriented entertainment to their intended market. Neither is it the intent <br /> nor effect of this resolution to condone or legitimize the distribution of obscene material. <br /> 2. Findings and Rationale. Based on evidence of the adverse secondary effects of adult uses <br /> presented in hearings and in reports made available to the Board of Supervisors, and on <br /> findings, interpretations, and narrowing constructions incorporated in the cases of City of <br /> Littleton v. Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C., 541 U.S. 774 (2004); City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books', <br /> Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002); City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); City of Renton v. <br /> Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986); Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50 <br /> (1976); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991); California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109 <br /> (1972); N.Y. State Liquor Authority v. Bellanca, 452 U.S. 714 (1981); Sewell v. Georgia, 435 <br /> U.S. 982 (1978); FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990); City of Dallas v. <br /> Stanglin, 490 U.S. 19 (1989); and <br /> Farkas v. Miller, 151 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 1998);Jokes, Ltd. v. City of Coates,284 F.3d 884(8th <br /> Cir. 2002); BLIPS, Inc. v. City of Mankato,268 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2001);SOB, Inc. v. County <br /> of Benton, 317 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2003);Scope Pictures v. City of Kansas City, 140 F.3d 1201 <br /> (8th Cir. 1998);ILQ Invs. v. City of Rochester,25 F.3d 1413 (8th Cir. 1994); City of Lincoln v. <br /> ABC Books', Inc.,470 N.W.2d 760 (Neb. 1991);Xiong v. City of Moorhead,2009 WL 322217 <br /> (D. Minn. Feb. 2, 2009); Entm't Prods., Inc. v. Shelby County, 721 F.3d 729 (6th Cir. 2013); <br /> Lund v. City of Fall River, 714 F.3d 65 (1st Cir. 2013);Imaginary Images, Inc. v. Evans, 612 <br /> F.3d 736 (4th Cir. 2010); LLEH, Inc. v. Wichita County, 289 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2002); Ocello <br /> v. Koster, 354 S.W.3d 187 (Mo. 2011); 84 Video/Newsstand, Inc. v. Sartini,2011 WL <br /> 3904097 (6th Cir. Sept. 7, 2011); Plaza Group Properties, LLC v. Spencer County Plan <br /> Commission, 877 N.E.2d 877 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007); Flanigan's Enters., Inc. v. Fulton County, <br /> 596 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2010);East Brooks Books', Inc. v. Shelby County, 588 F.3d 360 (6th <br /> Cir. 2009); Entm't Prods., Inc. v. Shelby County, 588 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 2009);Sensations, <br /> Inc, v. City of Grand Rapids, 526 F.3d 291 (6th Cir. 2008); World Wide Video of Washington, <br /> Inc. v. City of Spokane, 368 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2004);Ben's Bar, Inc. v. Village of Somerset, <br /> 316 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 2003); Peek-a-Boo Lounge v. Manatee County, 630 F.3d 1346 (11th <br /> Cir. 2011); Daytona Grand, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 490 F.3d 860 (11th Cir. 2007); <br /> Heideman v. South Salt Lake City, 348 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2003); Williams v. Morgan,478 <br /> 11 <br />