That Article 3: General Regulations,be amended to add a new subsection 3.29 as follows:
<br /> Section 3.29 Adult Establishment Regulations
<br /> Section 3.29.01 Purpose; Findings and Rationale
<br /> 1, Purpose. It is the purpose of this resolution to regulate adult establishments in order to
<br /> promote the health, safety, and general welfare of the citizens of the County, and to establish
<br /> reasonable and uniform regulations to prevent the deleterious secondary effects of adult
<br /> establishments within the County. The provisions of this resolution have neither the purpose
<br /> nor effect of imposing a limitation or restriction on the content or reasonable access to any
<br /> communicative materials, including sexually oriented materials. Similarly, it is neither the
<br /> intent nor effect of this resolution to restrict or deny access by adults to sexually oriented
<br /> materials protected by the First Amendment, or to deny access by the distributors and
<br /> exhibitors of sexually oriented entertainment to their intended market. Neither is it the intent
<br /> nor effect of this resolution to condone or legitimize the distribution of obscene material.
<br /> 2. Findings and Rationale. Based on evidence of the adverse secondary effects of adult uses
<br /> presented in hearings and in reports made available to the Board of Supervisors, and on
<br /> findings, interpretations, and narrowing constructions incorporated in the cases of City of
<br /> Littleton v. Z.J. Gifts D-4, L.L.C., 541 U.S. 774 (2004); City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books',
<br /> Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002); City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000); City of Renton v.
<br /> Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986); Young v. American Mini Theatres, 427 U.S. 50
<br /> (1976); Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 501 U.S. 560 (1991); California v. LaRue, 409 U.S. 109
<br /> (1972); N.Y. State Liquor Authority v. Bellanca, 452 U.S. 714 (1981); Sewell v. Georgia, 435
<br /> U.S. 982 (1978); FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of Dallas, 493 U.S. 215 (1990); City of Dallas v.
<br /> Stanglin, 490 U.S. 19 (1989); and
<br /> Farkas v. Miller, 151 F.3d 900 (8th Cir. 1998);Jokes, Ltd. v. City of Coates,284 F.3d 884(8th
<br /> Cir. 2002); BLIPS, Inc. v. City of Mankato,268 F.3d 603 (8th Cir. 2001);SOB, Inc. v. County
<br /> of Benton, 317 F.3d 856 (8th Cir. 2003);Scope Pictures v. City of Kansas City, 140 F.3d 1201
<br /> (8th Cir. 1998);ILQ Invs. v. City of Rochester,25 F.3d 1413 (8th Cir. 1994); City of Lincoln v.
<br /> ABC Books', Inc.,470 N.W.2d 760 (Neb. 1991);Xiong v. City of Moorhead,2009 WL 322217
<br /> (D. Minn. Feb. 2, 2009); Entm't Prods., Inc. v. Shelby County, 721 F.3d 729 (6th Cir. 2013);
<br /> Lund v. City of Fall River, 714 F.3d 65 (1st Cir. 2013);Imaginary Images, Inc. v. Evans, 612
<br /> F.3d 736 (4th Cir. 2010); LLEH, Inc. v. Wichita County, 289 F.3d 358 (5th Cir. 2002); Ocello
<br /> v. Koster, 354 S.W.3d 187 (Mo. 2011); 84 Video/Newsstand, Inc. v. Sartini,2011 WL
<br /> 3904097 (6th Cir. Sept. 7, 2011); Plaza Group Properties, LLC v. Spencer County Plan
<br /> Commission, 877 N.E.2d 877 (Ind. Ct. App. 2007); Flanigan's Enters., Inc. v. Fulton County,
<br /> 596 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2010);East Brooks Books', Inc. v. Shelby County, 588 F.3d 360 (6th
<br /> Cir. 2009); Entm't Prods., Inc. v. Shelby County, 588 F.3d 372 (6th Cir. 2009);Sensations,
<br /> Inc, v. City of Grand Rapids, 526 F.3d 291 (6th Cir. 2008); World Wide Video of Washington,
<br /> Inc. v. City of Spokane, 368 F.3d 1186 (9th Cir. 2004);Ben's Bar, Inc. v. Village of Somerset,
<br /> 316 F.3d 702 (7th Cir. 2003); Peek-a-Boo Lounge v. Manatee County, 630 F.3d 1346 (11th
<br /> Cir. 2011); Daytona Grand, Inc. v. City of Daytona Beach, 490 F.3d 860 (11th Cir. 2007);
<br /> Heideman v. South Salt Lake City, 348 F.3d 1182 (10th Cir. 2003); Williams v. Morgan,478
<br /> 11
<br />
|