My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/25/2015
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
2015
>
08/25/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/29/2016 11:30:42 AM
Creation date
12/22/2015 12:14:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
McCleary/Rural Hotspots 157 <br /> available. These offenders lack legitimate means of livelihood and devote substantial <br /> time to illegitimate activities; they are "professional thieves" by Sutherland's (1937) <br /> definition. Otherwise, they are a heterogeneous group—some are vice purveyors <br /> who dabble in crime, whereas others are predatory criminals who promise vice to <br /> lure and lull their victims. Despite their heterogeneity, the offenders share a rational <br /> decision-making calculus that draws them to adult business sites. <br /> Expected Value <br /> Criminological thinking has changed little in the 75 years since Shaw's(1930/1966) <br /> Jack-Roller. To document the rational choices of predatory criminals, Wright and <br /> Decker (1997) interviewed 86 active armed robbers. Asked to describe a perfect <br /> victim, all mentioned victims involved in vice, either as sellers or buyers. Three of <br /> the armed robbers worked as prostitutes: <br /> From their perspective,the ideal robbery target was a married man in search of an illicit <br /> sexual adventure; he would be disinclined to make a police report for fear of exposing <br /> his own deviance. (p. 69) <br /> The rational calculus described by these prostitute-robbers echoes the descriptions <br /> of other predators (see Bennett&Wright, 1984; Feeney, 1986; Fleisher, 1995; Katz, <br /> 1988, 1991; Shover, 1996). <br /> Police Presence <br /> With respect to the quantity and quality (or value) of the targets at a site, urban <br /> and rural adult business sites are equally attractive to the rational offender. Police <br /> presence is generally lower at rural sites, however. Some part of the urban–rural dis- <br /> parity is because of obvious factors. Rural police agencies protect larger areas with <br /> fewer personnel, for example, and drive longer distances in response to calls. Though <br /> less obvious, fuzzier jurisdictional lines and more complex demands for service <br /> make policing more difficult and less effective in rural areas(Thurman & McGarrell, <br /> 1997;Weisheit,Falcone, &Wells, 1999). Because police presence is relatively lower <br /> at rural sites, controlling for the quantity and quality of targets, rural sites are more <br /> attractive to the rational offender. <br /> Montrose, Illinois: A Case Study <br /> An unincorporated village of 250 residents, Montrose, Illinois is located on I-70 <br /> midway between St. Louis and Indianapolis. I-70 separates Montrose's residential <br /> dwellings from its businesses: a convenience store-gas station, a motel, and for a <br /> short period, a tavern. Other than gas and lodging, cross-country travelers had no <br /> reason to exit I-70 at Montrose prior to February, 2003. In that month, the Lion's <br /> Downloaded from http:!Icjpsageputn01311 LIFORNIA IRVINE on May 25,2008 <br /> ®2008 SAGE Publications.All rights rase I martial use or unauthorized distribution. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.