Laserfiche WebLink
- that communities vigorously prosecute violations of obscenity laws and other <br /> sex- <br /> related crimes, making use of asset forfeiture and injunctive procedures where <br /> possible. <br /> ISLIP, NEW YORK <br /> September 23, 1980 <br /> This study was performed through a review of studies and ordinances from Detroit, MI, <br /> Norwalk, CA, Dallas, TX, Prince George's County, MD, and New Orleans, LA, a survey of media <br /> coverage and public reaction arising out of the establishment of a sexually oriented bookstore in <br /> the city, and inspection of sexually oriented businesses. <br /> Islip's study recommended basing an ordinance on the dispersal-style 1976 Detroit <br /> ordinance. Its authors reviewed the existing case law that required space to be available for <br /> adult uses and forbade attempting to zone adult uses out completely. <br /> Islip planers observed that two sex businesses in the downtown area were responsible <br /> for creating a "dead zone" that people not interested in adult uses actively avoided—at a <br /> detriment to neighboring businesses. Also, short-term parking was used long term by patrons of <br /> the sex business. In some cases the authors observed that the sexually oriented businesses <br /> that were close to other businesses appeared to have had a negative impact on those nearby <br /> businesses. Also, they noted that a significant number of the owners and managers had ties to <br /> organized crime, with multiple arrests and convictions. <br /> Islip planners recommended that adult uses be restricted to industrial zones. They also <br /> recommended a 500' buffer between adult uses and residential and public facilities. Because <br /> Islip has a rural highway with sex-businesses located an average of 1.1 miles apart, for 5 miles, <br /> the planning department recommended that a buffer of a half mile be placed between any sex <br /> businesses on this specific highway to prevent the development of a "Combat Zone" on the road <br /> into the town. They also recommended establishing an amortization system by which <br /> nonconforming sexually oriented businesses would be phased out over a period of years. More <br /> broadly, they recommended that the entire ordinance be focused on reducing the negative <br /> effects of sex businesses. <br /> The proposed ordinance (included as an appendix to the study) was upheld in <br /> substantial part by New York's highest court in Town of Islip v. Caviglia, 73 N.Y.2d 544, 540 <br /> N.E.2d 215, 542 N.Y.S.2d 139 (1989). <br /> NEW YORK CITY, NEW YORK <br /> 1994 <br /> This extensive and well-assembled study was performed by New York City's Department <br /> of City Planning ("DCP"). The DCP reviewed studies and ordinances from other localities and <br /> studied the industry as it existed in New York City—among other things, meeting with members <br /> of the sexually oriented business industry. The DCP reviewed accounts of secondary effects <br /> from sources as diverse as the City Planning Commission, the Office of Midtown Enforcement, <br /> the Chelsea Business Survey, the Task Force on the Regulation of Sex-Related Businesses, <br /> 13 <br /> 000026 <br />