April 23, 2013 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Mr. Schuppan questioned if the claim is denied would there be an issue on a 1099 and it would not affect it because the 1099 is based on when the payment is received. Gary the board deals with time lines and if the board made a make exception would this hold up in court. Mr. Zitterkopf stated that based on the state statute he agrees with the wording that it "shall" be denied. Stacey Ruzicka stated that she called Clerk of the District Court Valorie Bendixen and she stated that there is smaller pool of attorneys for the mental health board hearings and Mr. Fogarty is used because of his experience. Pam asked if the baard could ask the state attorney general to address this issue and Mr. Zitterkopf stated the board would not get an opinion an a civil matter. Discussion was held. Mr. Schuppan questianed if he has been paid since 2010 and County Clerk Canley stated that he has been paid. Arnold questioned if there would be a risk if the board makes an exception and pays this claim but would deny others? Mr. Zitterkapf answered yes. Arnold made a motion and McFarland seconded to pull this claim for further clarification from the state auditor and bring it back in 2 weeks. Mr. Purdy stated that he does not think the state auditor will tell us if we should pay this claim it is up to the County Board. Ms. Lancaster questioned if this would be an audit exception. Mr. Quandt noted that this is a bill over 90 days old and it afFects the budget if it isn't submitted and paid. The vote on the motian to pull this claim for clarification was held. Arnold, McFarland and Schuppan voted yes and Lancaster, Quandt, Purdy and Ziola voted no. Motion failed. Ziola made a motion and Purdy seconded to deny the claims to Jerry Fogarty for the mental health services provided that were over 90 days old with regret. Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziala all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. Notice of the denial must be sent in 5 days. Lancaster noted that the amount was not the issue it is the state statute. She asked if the board had any other claims to discuss. Quandt made a motion and Arnold seconded to apprave the bi weekly pay claims and the regular claims except for the Offce Net claim. Arnold, Lancaster, McFarland, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all voted yes and none voted no. Motion carried. Quandt made a motion and Ziola seconded ta approve the Office Net claim. Mr. McF'arland stated that he will abstain because he has a business relationship with Office Net. Arnold, Lancaster, Purdy, Quandt, Schuppan and Ziola all vated yes and none voted no. McFarland abstained Motion carried. COMMITTEE OR BOARD MEMBER'S REPORTS — Mr. Schuppan stated that the public works 3