My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05-11-1999 Minutes
LFImages
>
County Clerk
>
Board Minutes & Agendas
>
Board of Commissioners
>
Agendas & Minutes
>
Prior Years
>
1999
>
05-11-1999 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2005 10:22:12 AM
Creation date
3/31/2005 2:46:19 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
County Clerk
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />--- <br />r19990181 <br /> <br />PROPOSAL FOR ACQUISITION OF CAAP LANDS FOR PUBLIC USE AT NOMINAL <br />COST: Pat Hancock requested to address the board on the transfer <br />of the CAAP land. She suggested that the board should check on <br />the grandfather law of 1942 that was on a handshake agreement <br />that the land would revert back to the original land owners when <br />the army was finished with it. Hartman stated that unfortunately <br />the county cannot do anything now. The board thanked Pat for her <br />information. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATION FROM BUILDING & GROUNDS COMMITTEE ON BIDS FOR <br />REMODELING AT SAFETY CENTER: Logan reported that only on bid was <br />received from Baker Development. Logan made a motion and Arnold <br />seconded to accept the bid from Baker Development for the <br />remodeling project at the safety center. Arnold, Hartman, <br />Jeffries, Lancaster, Landis, Logan and Stelk all voted yes and <br />none voted no. Motion carried. <br /> <br />CONSIDER AND ADOPT RESOLUTION RECINDING ACTION REGARDING <br />CONSERVATION EASEMENTS ON SOUTH LOCUST PROJECT: This would <br />rescind the July 5, 1994 motion and vote not to condemn property <br />on the South Locust Project. The county is trying to acquire the <br />property through negotiations and in order to insure federal <br />funding it may be necessary to condemn the land if the <br />negotiations are at an impasse. If this resolution is adopted it <br />would allow the county attorney or another attorney to proceed <br />with eminent domain proceedings. Hartman questioned why two <br />properties have not signed with the city but Olssen & Associates <br />stated that they have reached an agreement with the twp property <br />owners. Even if eminent domain is started the negotiations do <br />not stop this will only allow the project to go forward and allow <br />federal funding. <br /> <br />John Amick stated that the counter offers were good faith offers. <br />He stated that he only had one meeting with FMI and he requested <br />to wait until May 20 when there will be another series of <br />meetings. He expressed concern that if the City is named as <br />owner on the easements and the land is annexed this would cause <br />problems for the Doniphan School District. Logan stated that the <br />negotiators are attempting to come up with a reasonable <br />settlement. Stelk made a motion and Hartman seconded to table <br />the resolution to rescind action regarding conservation easements <br />on South Locust Street project. Stelk expressed her concern that <br />Hartman seconded the motion. Hartman withdrew his second and <br />Lancaster seconded the motion. Lancaster stated that by tabling <br />the action it would allow one more meeting for the property <br />owners and the negotiators. Arnold stated that this action will <br />not stop the negotiations it would only insure that the county <br />would be partners with the city and federal government. Bill <br />Schuppan expressed his concern that he was only contacted one <br />time and he did not like the city named on the conservation <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.